Ripple CLO Says Crypto Fraud Can Be Fought Without Getting Political

Godfrey Benjamin
April 5, 2024
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

Highlights

  • Ripple CLO has once again called out the political prosecution styles of crypto cases
  • He believes the SEC can learn from the DOJ
  • Ripple proponents wants lawmakers to enact a new law to capture this change

Regarding the OneCoin fraud case, Ripple Labs’ Chief Legal Officer Stuart Alderoty has noted that crypto frauds could be contested in ways other than political. 

Advertisement
Advertisement

Ripple CLO Calls Out SEC’s Political Approach

A few days ago, the United States Court system sentenced Irina Dilkinska, the ex-head of Legal and Compliance at OneCoin to four years imprisonment. 

This ruling was in line with her involvement in the crypto pyramid scheme that stole more than $4 billion from unsuspecting investors. A few people involved with the case have been indicted by the U.S. government. 

Ripple CLO used this case as his reference to address the authorities’ shortcomings in terms of crypto cases.

By Alderoty’s post, he seems to be pointing to the public opinion that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is launching a political battle in the crypto industry. This comes after Gurbir Grewal, an SEC Director stated that the commission acts with integrity in crypto regulation. Grewal was attempting to address claims that the SEC engages in regulation through enforcement.

The statement triggered Ripple CLO to react as he criticized the SEC Director’s claim about the Commission. To buttress his argument, he cited some instances when federal courts rebuked the SEC for failing to act in good faith. One such event is the Debt Box case which highlighted the SEC’s gross abuse of power. 

The SEC accused Debt Box of defrauding investors of over $50 million. This led to a restraining order and an asset freeze against Debt Box, which in turn impacted negatively on the company’s operation. In the long run, the Commission admitted to presenting false statements in court against Debt Box. 

On this matter, XRP lawyer John E. Deaton voiced his concerns about potential government overreach in the Debt Box case.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Track of SEC’s Animosity Toward Crypto

Ripple CLO also recalled how a district judge admonished the regulator for its lack of faithful allegiance to the law in the Ripple lawsuit. 

Additionally, in the SEC lawsuit against Grayscale Investments, the court declared that the SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously. Furthermore, Alderoty cited some other inconsistencies in the SEC’s guidance on crypto.

A similar action from the SEC was seen in 2023 as the commission launched a series of enforcement actions against cryptocurrency exchanges like Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken. To correct this trend, many Ripple supporters are advocating for new laws to be introduce to stop such vindictive charges.

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
Benjamin Godfrey is a blockchain enthusiast and journalists who relish writing about the real life applications of blockchain technology and innovations to drive general acceptance and worldwide integration of the emerging technology. His desires to educate people about cryptocurrencies inspires his contributions to renowned blockchain based media and sites. Benjamin Godfrey is a lover of sports and agriculture. Follow him on X, Linkedin
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.