Ripple Lists 4 Reasons Why The SEC Should Release Hinman Memos

In a recent letter, Ripple offered a harsh rebuke to the Securities and Exchange Commission's move to block documents crucial to the case.
By Ashish Kumar
Updated July 18, 2022
US SEC Submits Appeal Brief To Challenge Ripple's XRP Sales Ruling

In a recent letter, Ripple offered a harsh rebuke to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) move to block documents crucial to the case.

The U.S SEC vs Ripple lawsuit is still revolving around the revelation and verdict of former director Bill Hinman’s Infamous Ethereum Speech. In the last few sittings, the court has even revised the summary judgment Schedule to draw a conclusion about the case. Meanwhile, Ripple Defendants have filed an opposition to the commission’s claim over the Speech and notes.

The court has directed the commission to display the disputed memos related to the 2018 speech. The SEC has been hesitant to produce them. At first, they even try to shield it under the deliberative process privilege (DPP). Lately, the commission is trying to claim that the memos now come under the Attorney Client Privilege.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Ripple cites four reasons why what the SEC did is wrong:

1) As per the case recordings Hinman gave the speech in his personal capacity. He took advice from the SEC’s staff to prepare the speech. According to the second circuit law, the discussed legal concepts among them don’t fill in for Attorney client privilege.

2) Hinman has the authorisation to receive legal advice and communicated with SEC lawyers. However, the content of his personal remark does not come under the scope of attorney client relationship.

3) The discussion over the issue does not involve any confidential information concerning the agency which should be protected under the same privilege.

4) However, the commission completely fails to establish the claim as the privilege belongs to Hinman.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Let the court decide

The defendants have demanded that the SEC should now produce the DPP redactions or any memos to be withheld under the Attorney client Privilege for an In camera inspection. They even requested the court to review the redaction by themself.

The court should evaluate any attorney-client relationship between Hinman and the SEC staff regarding the speech draft. If there is any, then the court decides to include them as legal advice or confidential information shielded by the privilege.

Advertisement
Ashish Kumar
Ashish believes in Decentralisation and has a keen interest in evolving Blockchain technology, Cryptocurrency ecosystem, and NFTs. He aims to create awareness around the growing Crypto industry through his writings and analysis. When he is not writing, he is playing video games, watching some thriller movie, or is out for some outdoor sports. Reach me at [email protected]
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.