Ripple SEC Lawsuit: XRP Lawyer Highlights SEC’s Inappropriate Stance Towards Ripple

Ripple SEC Lawsuit: SEC's treatment of Ripple, including seeking a hefty penalty, reveals a unjustified biased approach compared to other crypto cases.
By Rupam Roy
Ripple Vs SEC Lawsuit: Last Minute Opening Brief By Outgoing Gary Gensler

Highlights

  • XRP lawyer Bill Morgan claims the SEC exhibits an unusual bias against Ripple.
  • Ripple argues the SEC's $876 million penalty demand is disproportionate compared to other cases.
  • Ripple references the TerraForm case to challenge the SEC's punitive approach in their lawsuit.

Ripple SEC Lawsuit: Ripple’s legal battle with the SEC has sparked market discussions as pro-XRP lawyer Bill Morgan spotlights the regulator’s “strange animus” towards Ripple. Morgan argues that the fine sought against Ripple starkly contrasts with those in other crypto cases, suggesting an unusual bias.

Notably, Ripple’s recent filing in the XRP lawsuit, referencing the TerraForm Labs case, underscores this perceived inconsistency.

Advertisement
Advertisement

SEC Shows Unusual Biasness Towards Ripple

Ripple has once again brought attention to its ongoing conflict with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In its latest court filing, the company pointed to the penalties in the TerraForm Labs case to argue against what it sees as disproportionate demands from the SEC.

Notably, pro-XRP lawyer Bill Morgan emphasized that the SEC’s attitude towards Ripple appears unusually harsh. He noted that in the TerraForm Labs case, the SEC requested $4.47 billion in penalties, which included $3.58 billion in disgorgement and $420 million in civil penalties.

This total sum was equivalent to approximately 1.27% of TerraForm’s gross sales of $33 billion. However, Morgan noted that this case involved significant investor losses and fraudulent activities, yet the SEC settled for a penalty within the lower range of what it typically seeks.

Meanwhile, he compared this with the Ripple SEC lawsuit, where the SEC is demanding an $876 million penalty. This figure is about 20 times higher than the penalties in other crypto-related cases, where fines typically range between 0.6% and 1.8% of gross sales. Ripple’s legal team argued that this discrepancy shows an unreasonable and biased approach by the SEC.

Also Read: Ripple and Archax to Bring Tokenized RWA Worth Millions to XRP Ledger

Advertisement
Advertisement

SEC’s Inconsistent Approach

Ripple’s filing suggests that the SEC’s approach in its case has been inconsistent compared to other similar cases. The company drew parallels with the TerraForm Labs settlement, where the SEC’s penalty was significantly lower, despite more severe allegations.

Notably, in the TerraForm case, founder Do Kwon and his company were accused of orchestrating one of the largest securities frauds in U.S. history, causing investors to lose $40 billion. However, the SEC’s settlement request represented a mere fraction of TerraForm’s gross sales.

Ripple highlighted this inconsistency, arguing that the SEC’s demands against it are overly punitive. The company, as well as Bill Morgan, noted that there were no fraud allegations in its case, and institutional buyers did not incur losses, making the hefty penalty sought by the SEC even more confusing.

Meanwhile, Ripple’s latest move involves filing a notice of supplemental authority, citing the TerraForm Labs case to strengthen its position. This filing questions the rationale behind the SEC’s excessive penalty request and suggests that the regulatory body might be treating Ripple with undue severity.

Although the latest turn in the legal fight has caught many eyes in the crypto community, XRP struggled to show any positive momentum. As of writing, XRP price was down 1.4% and exchanged hands at $0.4799, while its trading volume slipped 16% to $1.05 billion.

Also Read:

Advertisement
Rupam Roy
Rupam is a seasoned professional with three years of experience in the financial market, where he has developed a reputation as a meticulous research analyst and insightful journalist. He thrives on exploring the dynamic nuances of the financial landscape. Currently serving as a sub-editor at Coingape, Rupam's expertise extends beyond conventional boundaries. His role involves breaking stories, analyzing AI-related developments, providing real-time updates on the crypto market, and presenting insightful economic news. Rupam's career is characterized by a deep passion for unraveling the complexities of finance and delivering impactful stories that resonate with a diverse audience.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.