As the trial of Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), the former CEO of FTX Derivatives Exchange enters its second week, the courtroom drama unraveled shocking revelations and allegations. Caroline Ellison, SBF’s former partner, was the first witness to testify in the trial’s second week, providing devastating testimony that sent ripples through the crypto community.
Ellison’s testimony has not only cast a shadow over the crypto innovator but has also raised questions about the broader implications of his actions and aspirations. Here’s a recap of what we’ve learned during this week of the trial:
Ellison admitted to committing fraud during her tenure as the CEO of Alameda Research. However, she maintained that she did so under the direction of Sam Bankman-Fried, who had set up systems that made it easy to siphon money from FTX.
According to her testimony, these fraudulent activities were responsible for siphoning around $14 billion from FTX customers for Alameda Research’s investments. She confessed to manipulating balance sheets to present a less risky image of Alameda, thus securing investments.
During their turbulent three-year relationship, Ellison revealed that SBF had aspirations beyond the world of cryptocurrency. He confided in her about his desire to make a substantial impact in both business and politics.
This revelation shed light on SBF’s significant financial contributions to political parties through FTX. The alleged diversion of these contributions for personal gain has raised concerns about the nature of these financial dealings.
Ellison also testified that SBF intended to raise funds by selling FTX equity to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. This revelation, along with a note suggesting the deliberate manipulation of Bitcoin prices, has raised concerns about the potential influence of key figures on crypto markets
SBF’s defense team also grappled with court rulings that have limited their ability to cross-examine key witnesses, such as former FTX CTO Gary Wang and Caroline Ellison. They have also sought clarification and reconsideration of certain aspects of the court’s rulings. The courtroom has witnessed intense legal maneuvering, as SBF’s attorneys try to shape the narrative in their client’s favor.
Long before the trials, the United States Department of Justice (DoJ) sought to revoke SBF’s bail, accusing him of witness tampering. Judge Lewis Kaplan granted this request, further complicating SBF’s legal situation.
The US FDIC plans to publish draft rules that will detail how stablecoin issuers apply…
Bitcoin saw a slight relief rebound as Fed Chair Jerome Powell did not address the…
Vanguard will be opening its platform to a variety of crypto ETF products. The firm…
A new congressional report from Representative French Hill makes several allegations against federal regulators. It…
Kalshi has moved fully on-chain with the launch of tokenized prediction markets on Solana, marking…
Bitcoin may be lining up for a powerful rebound, as Fundstrat’s Tom Lee believes a…