SEC Dodges To Take Position On “Security” Issue In Binance Case

As per the transcription, the court asked the SEC about the defendants trading tokens that are not considered as securities.
By Ashish Kumar
Updated May 16, 2025
Breaking: US SEC Amends Binance Lawsuit, No Longer Consider Solana As Security

Crypto News: The world’s two biggest crypto exchanges, Binance and Coinbase (NASDAQ: COIN) are facing legal complications from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for allegedly breaching operation rules. As the legal tussle continues, Coinbase Legal Chief pointed out the commission’s confusing approach to token categorization in the Binance case.

Also Read: XRP Lawyer Settles Debate On XRP As Security

Advertisement
Advertisement

SEC Refuses Take Position

Paul Grewal, Chief Legal Officer for Coinbase mentioned that while reviewing a transcript of Binance’s hearing before Judge Jackson, he spotted the US SEC’s puzzling legal strategy.

As per the transcription, the court asked the SEC about the defendants trading tokens that are not considered as securities. So, are the rest of the tokens security or not?

SEC Counsel dodged the question stating that it is reserving its right as they are still at the pleading stage. It is required to get into the discovery phase where a full assessment can be done around the categorisation.

However, the court again inquired about the tokens which are not mentioned in the lawsuit. It asked where the commission place them, and do they fall in the commodities category. Meanwhile, the SEC stated that “they are not taking any position’ over them and try to get past. It added that it is the way more details are required under Rule 8. The commission gave the court and parties notice mentioning that 14 tokens including BNB are disputed. Read More SEC Crypto News Here…

Also Read: Coinbase Bags Another Win Against US SEC In Crypto Rulemaking Case

Advertisement
Advertisement

WatchDog Looking To Get A Pass

Coinbase Legal Chief marked that since when does Rule 8 (or 11) allow any party to reserve identifying what it claims to “Get past” and motion to dismiss? He praised the counsel for being honest but considered it as unlawful.

According to Attorney John Deaton, XRP Holders’ lawyer, SEC’s this argument suggests that they are reserving their rights to call everything as security at a later date.

Advertisement
Ashish Kumar
Ashish believes in Decentralisation and has a keen interest in evolving Blockchain technology, Cryptocurrency ecosystem, and NFTs. He aims to create awareness around the growing Crypto industry through his writings and analysis. When he is not writing, he is playing video games, watching some thriller movie, or is out for some outdoor sports. Reach me at [email protected]
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.