SEC Lawyers Exit After Judge Raps Agency for ‘Abuse’ in Debt Box Case

SEC attorneys resign post 'gross abuse' rebuke by judge in Debt Box crypto case. Critics slam the agency's enforcement tactics.
By Maxwell Mutuma
US SEC Chair Gary Gensler To Propose Crypto Regulations Amid Resignation Calls

Highlights

  • SEC attorneys resigned following the federal judge's reprimand for “gross abuse” in the Debt Box crypto fraud case.
  • Judge sanctions SEC for false statements, undermining the integrity of proceedings.
  • Criticism mounts against SEC's “regulation by enforcement” strategy in the crypto industry.

Two attorneys from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have reportedly resigned after a federal judge reprimanded the agency for “gross abuse” of power and acting in “bad faith” in a case against the crypto platform Debt Box. The resignation of the lawyers comes as a consequence of the agency’s alleged misconduct in the high-profile crypto fraud case.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Judge Cites SEC’s ‘Gross Abuse’ of Power

According to reports, Michael Welsh and Joseph Watkins, the lead attorneys in the SEC case against Debt Box, stepped down earlier this month. Sources familiar with the situation revealed that the lawyers were warned of termination if they chose to remain at the agency. The decision to resign followed a scathing ruling by Chief Judge Robert J. Shelby, who presided over the case in Salt Lake City, Utah.

In March, Judge Shelby sanctioned the SEC for making false statements and misrepresentations in its case against Digital Licensing Inc., known as Debt Box. The judge stated in the March 18 filing that “the Commission’s above-discussed conduct constitutes a gross abuse of the power entrusted to it by Congress and substantially undermined the integrity of these proceedings and the judicial process.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Debt Box Crypto Fraud Allegations

The SEC’s case against Debt Box stemmed from allegations of a $50 million crypto fraud scheme. In August 2022, the agency obtained an emergency relief to halt the Utah-based company, temporarily freezing its assets and obtaining restraining orders against Debt Box’s principals. Judge Shelby, however, criticized the SEC’s evidence, stating that it “lacked any basis” but was nonetheless presented in “deliberately false and misleading ways.”

The judge further highlighted the SEC’s attempts to “subtly shift the language to gloss over and perpetuate the misconduct,” referring to Welsh’s deemed incorrect statements during a hearing. Judge Shelby’s harsh rebuke prompted the resignations of Welsh and Watkins, who were relatively new to the agency, according to their LinkedIn profiles.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Regulatory Scrutiny and Industry Criticism

The crypto industry has been vocal in its criticism of the SEC’s approach under Chair Gary Gensler, particularly concerning the agency’s “regulation by enforcement” strategy. Critics argue that this approach has increased regulatory uncertainty in the industry, stifling innovation and undermining U.S. competitiveness in the digital asset space.

High-profile enforcement actions against crypto platforms have included lawsuits against crypto exchanges Coinbase and Binance and the agency’s forthcoming action over the decentralized finance platform Uniswap. The Debt Box case and the subsequent resignations of SEC lawyers have further fueled the debate surrounding the agency’s handling of crypto-related cases.

Read Also: Bitcoin Consensus Rules Questioned by Ripple CTO

Advertisement
Maxwell Mutuma
Maxwell is a crypto-economic analyst and Blockchain enthusiast, passionate about helping people understand the potential of decentralized technology. I write extensively on topics such as blockchain, cryptocurrency, tokens, and more for many publications. My goal is to spread knowledge about this revolutionary technology and its implications for economic freedom and social good.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.