SEC vs. XRP: Ripple Fights Back Against SEC’s Late Discovery Demands

Ripple stands firm against SEC's additional document requests in the lawsuit, challenging the demands as untimely and irrelevant.
By Maxwell Mutuma
Ripple SEC Case XRP lawsuit US SEC appeal

Ripple, the prominent blockchain payments company, is pushing back against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the XRP and SEC ongoing legal battle. In a recent development, Ripple has objected to the SEC’s latest request for post-complaint discovery. The dispute centers around the SEC’s motion to compel Ripple to produce additional documents and answer new interrogatories, a move Ripple deems untimely and irrelevant to the case.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Ripple Challenges SEC’s Discovery Requests

The legal skirmish took a new turn as XRP filed a response opposing the SEC’s motion. The regulatory body seeks to compel Ripple to provide audited financial statements for 2022 and 2023 and disclose details of all post-complaint XRP transactions with non-employee parties. Additionally, the SEC demands answers regarding the amount of revenue Ripple generated from XRP institutional sales after the complaint was filed.

Ripple’s counter is firm, asserting that these requests are not only untimely but also irrelevant to the case at hand. The company emphasizes that the SEC had ample opportunity to request this information during the open fact discovery phase but chose not to. Now, XRP argues, the SEC lacks valid grounds to demand such data.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Stakes of Post-Complaint Discovery

The essence of Ripple’s opposition lies in the timing and relevance of the SEC’s demands. Ripple highlights that the SEC’s late requests come after the closure of fact discovery, except for a narrow scope granted by the Court. The company also points out that the SEC’s requests exceed the 25 interrogatory limit under Rule 33 and that the post-complaint conduct is not germane to the case.

XRP’s stance is that addressing the legality of its post-complaint XRP sales could lead to unnecessary and lengthy side litigation. This perspective aligns with the broader sentiment in the XRP community, which has been closely following the lawsuit and is eagerly anticipating a resolution in 2024.

Read Also: Spot Bitcoin ETF: Proponents Calls For Vanguard Boycott

Advertisement
Maxwell Mutuma
Maxwell is a crypto-economic analyst and Blockchain enthusiast, passionate about helping people understand the potential of decentralized technology. I write extensively on topics such as blockchain, cryptocurrency, tokens, and more for many publications. My goal is to spread knowledge about this revolutionary technology and its implications for economic freedom and social good.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.