Shiba Inu (SHIB) Burn Falls 70% This Week, Here’s Why

The SHIB token burn fell by 70% this week, speculations go to rising Ethereum gas fees amid memecoin frenzy.
By Coingape Staff
Updated October 17, 2024
Shiba Inu Burn Rate SHIB Shibarium

The Shiba Inu (SHIB) community has been on edge lately as the token burn rate has dropped by a staggering 70% in the past week. This sudden decline in burn rate has left many investors wondering what caused it, and whether or not it is related to the recent surge in Ethereum gas fees.

Advertisement
Advertisement

SHIB Burn Dropped By 70%

The drop in SHIB token burns has been particularly pronounced in the past seven days, with a 69.57% decrease. At the same time, the price of SHIB has remained relatively stable, with a 24-hour increase of 3.34%.

With the rise of meme coins in the crypto market, Ethereum has seen an unprecedented surge in gas fees, reaching a 12-month high of 87 gwei before dropping to an average of 80 gwei. This surge in fees has affected the trading of SHIB, an ERC20 token, and raised questions about its burn rate.

Advertisement
Advertisement

How ETH Gas Fees Impacts?

Gas fees are a critical part of the Ethereum network, as they are used to pay for transactions and smart contract executions. As the network has become more congested, gas fees have risen sharply, making it more expensive to use the network. This has affected SHIB token burns, which have fallen in response to the rising costs.

Holders of SHIB tokens are becoming less willing to burn them, perhaps due to the high costs associated with doing so.

If the fees begin to decrease, we may see a resurgence in SHIB token burns. But it is clear that the rising cost of using the Ethereum network is having a significant impact on the cryptocurrency market, and particularly on ERC20 tokens like SHIB.

Advertisement
Coingape Staff
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.