Socket Loses $3.3 Million in Hack Due to Input Validation Flaw

Blockchain interoperability protocol Socket reported a security breach on Tuesday that resulted in over $3.3 million in losses. The incident impacted wallets that had granted infinite approvals to Socket contracts. It was attributed to a vulnerability in user input validation.
The exploit was linked to a specific route in the system that had been added just three days before the attack. As per blockchain security firm PeckShield, the problematic route has since been deactivated to prevent further misuse.
Socket identified the issue
In response to the breach, Socket said it has identified the vulnerability in user input validation. The hack affected its Bungee bridging aggregator.
Today's hack on @SocketDotTech results in the loss of >$3.3m.
The bad route exploited in the hack was added 3 days ago and is now disabled. Here are related txs:
– add route tx: https://t.co/lxw7iA1kn4
– disable route tx:https://t.co/QMHfI4YeuUThe hack is due to… https://t.co/QdBBgVF287 pic.twitter.com/yNxF5vCwax
— PeckShield Inc. (@peckshield) January 16, 2024
Socket acknowledged the breach and informed users of the action taken to address the situation. The company paused the affected contracts and reassured users that no further actions were needed on their part. The response aimed to limit the impact and protect user assets.
Hacken, another cybersecurity firm, confirmed that the vulnerability stemmed from a recently deployed contract. They identified the issue as an incomplete validation of user input, which allowed attackers to exploit the contracts for unauthorized fund transfers.
Meanwhile, blockchain developer Francesco Andreoli noted in a post, “Happy to report that users of @MetaMask swaps are safe from the current Socket Gateway hack. We’ll probably be writing a bit more soon about how our architecture allowed us to integrate Socket without being vulnerable to it.”
That said, the incident highlights the need for smart contract security as DeFi evolves. Not only does it call for rigorous security protocols, but decentralized applications require constant vigilance to protect user assets.
Crypto investor Ryan S. Adams, known as rsa.eth on X, shared his concerns as a “crypto native” in the context of a recent security breach. His tweets reflect the anxiety and challenges faced by individuals heavily invested in the cryptocurrency ecosystem, particularly during security incidents.
He noted, “Why can’t our wallets auto-revoke for us…why can’t they alert us when there’s an issue like this? We need protection against bugs and phishing inside our wallets.”
Also Read: Crypto Scam Alert: Hackers Exploit Fake NFT Game To Drain Funds
- Cathie Wood’s Ark Invest Backs Nasdaq-Listed Solmate To Launch $300M Solana Treasury
- First U.S. Spot Dogecoin and XRP ETFs Launch as REX-Osprey Debuts DOJE and XRPR
- Analyst Calls $6 XRP Target for November Amid Ripple CEO’s White House Stockpile Hint
- Ethereum Faces Selloff Risks As Whales’ Unrealized Profit Hits 2021 Highs
- Expert Predicts 138% Shiba Inu Rally as SHIB Futures Listing Opens Spot ETF Path
- Cardano Price Stays Above Ichimoku Cloud as Grayscale ADA ETF Approval Nears
- HBAR Price Prediction as SEC Approves Generic ETF Framework – Analyst Targets $1.80
- Toshi Coin Gains 57% in One Day: What’s Driving the Sudden Upside?
- Shiba Inu Price Set to Soar as Exchange Reserves Dive Amid SHIB ETF Chatter
- Pepe Coin Price Prediction as Whale Moves $25M From Robinhood- Is a Breakout to $0.00002 Next?
- XRP Price Prediction as Market Longs Hit 78% amid VivoPower Treasury Expansion Launch — Is $4 Next?