South Korean Courts lashes banks for breaking ties with crypto exchanges.

Achal Arya
October 30, 2018
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

South Korea, as a nation, has been progressive in accepting new innovation and technology and it has done same with blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Understanding this acceptance ethos of the country and its citizens, Seoul Central District Court has ruled in favor of a local crypto exchange and lashed the bank for breaking ties with the exchange

Advertisement
Advertisement

Its Coinis exchange vs Nonghyup Bank

According to the tweet put forward by Joseph Young, On October 30, Seoul Central District Court ruled in favor of a local crypto exchange in a legal battle between Coinis and Nonghyup, one of the largest commercial banks in South Korea.

According to the report, In September, Nonghyup unilaterally announced the termination of its banking partnership with the local exchange, disallowing the company from processing deposits and withdrawals with the bank. In response to this action by the bank, the exchange filed a request to end the suspension of deposits with the Seoul Central District Court in an attempt to restore the relationship with the bank.

Listening to the arguments from both ends, the court officially ruled the case in favor of Coinis and stated that the suspension of deposits and withdrawals imposed by Nonghyup against the crypto exchange was not fair.

Attorney Kim Tae-rim, who represented Coinis in the case, emphasized that the decision of the court to lift the suspension on the crypto exchange demonstrates that banks cannot unilaterally terminate services to businesses based on the guideline established by the Financial Services Commission (FSC). He was quoted saying

“Cryptocurrency exchanges, by default, have the right to freely deposit and withdraw funds to and from major banks in South Korea, and an abrupt termination of partnership and services by the bank [in this case Nonghyup] without sufficient evidence or reasoning falls under the breach of contract,”

The complaint filed by Coinis against Nonghyup, which was accepted by the Seoul Central District Court, is the first case in which a local cryptocurrency exchange challenged a major bank for mistreating cryptocurrency-related businesses.

Attorney Kim explained that the case has established an example for the industry, as it will lead banks to be increasing cautious in ending relationships with cryptocurrency exchanges without legal basis or sufficient evidence to prove a breach of contract.

Nonghyup seems a serial offender here as previously, it had also declined a partnership with Bithumb, the second largest cryptocurrency exchange in South Korea. But, at the time, analysts stated that the decision of Nonghyup to delay the deal between the bank and Bithumb was justified due to the two consecutive security breaches Bithumb suffered.

In September, Nonghyup signed a deal with Bithumb to process deposits and withdrawals on behalf of the exchange. A Bithumb representative was quoted saying

Bithumb is now able to issue virtual bank accounts for new users after a partnership has been established with NH Bank. Bithumb will continue to comply with the bank’s guideline strictly while cooperating with the government to create a transparent and robust market for local investors.

The court has left the precedent not just banks and courts in South Korea but across the world. It is necessary for other courts to understand and enforce that wrong enforcements of banks will no more be heard.

Will other courts pronounce similar decisions as the Seoul District court? Do let us know your views on the same?

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
Achal Arya is a digital product designer and an entrepreneur. He did his masters degree in design from IIT Hyderabad and has a bachelors degree in Computer Science. He works in the Web3 domain and manages new developments at CoinGape. Follow him on X at @arya_achal or reach him at achal[at]coingape.com.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.