Staking Ban Could Erode Appeal of Ethereum ETF: Bloomberg

Highlights

Proposed spot Ethereum ETFs face challenges as issuers drop staking plans due to regulatory concerns.
The decision may reduce the appeal of these funds compared to direct Ethereum investments, which offer staking rewards.
Without staking, investors prefer direct Ethereum investments over ETFs.

Proposed spot Ethereum ETFs face hurdles as issuers, including Fidelity and Ark Investment, drop staking plans. This decision, driven by regulatory concerns, could diminish the appeal of these funds compared to direct Ether investments, which offer staking rewards.

Staking Removal Hurts Ethereum ETFs Attractiveness

The removal of staking plans from Ethereum ETFs might reduce their attractiveness to investors. Staking is a crucial mechanism for Ethereum and other proof-of-stake blockchains, allowing holders to lock up deposits of cryptocurrency to validate transactions and secure the network. In return, stakers receive rewards, adding an extra layer of profit potential. Without this option, investors might find direct Ethereum investments more lucrative.

Brian Rudick, a senior strategist at GSR, highlighted the immediate opportunity cost of holding Ether via a US ETF due to forgone staking rewards. As ETFs cannot offer these staking rewards, investors might prefer to purchase Ether directly in the crypto market. This preference could significantly impact the ETF market and its potential growth.

The SEC’s stance on staking plays a crucial role in this development. Staking has been contentious because it allows holders to earn a yield, raising questions about whether the token should be classified as a security. This classification could bring it under stringent US regulations. Earlier, Kraken paid $30 million to settle SEC allegations related to its staking services, emphasizing the regulatory scrutiny staking faces.

Ayesha Kiani, COO of MNNC Group, pointed out that staking Ether is currently viewed as more of a security because it offers yield. This viewpoint aligns with the SEC’s standards, impacting the decisions of major ETF issuers like Fidelity and VanEck. With staking, these entities can contribute to securing the Ethereum blockchain, a missed opportunity for significant players to support the network.

Ethereum Stability Boosted by Staking Plan Removal

Many industry advocates see the removal of staking plans as a net positive for decentralization. Leo Mizuhara, founder of Hashnote, expressed concerns about centralizing forces within protocols like Ethereum. He noted that staked Ether in ETFs could have led to centralization, similar to the amount of Bitcoin (BTC) now held by Coinbase due to ETF phenomena.

Mizuhara added that centralizing forces could destabilize the protocol if issues arise. Hence, the absence of staking in ETFs could be beneficial for Ethereum’s stability. This perspective aligns with the goals of maintaining a decentralized financial system free from dependence on a few intermediaries.

GSR’s Rudick echoed this sentiment, suggesting that not having staking in ETFs could protect Ethereum from a long-term institutional takeover. The fear is that if Ether ETFs become as successful as Bitcoin ETFs, issuers could accumulate large amounts of Ether. Currently, about 27% of all outstanding Ether is staked, indicating a delicate balance within the network.

Also Read: Floki DAO Burns 15B FLOKI, Will Price Return To ATH?

TAGS
Ethereum

Recommended
Price Analysis

Best Crypto Presales To Invest In September 2025 – Top Upcoming Presale Tokens

Best Crypto AI Trading Bots In 2025

Top Meme Coins To Buy In September 2025

Maxwell Mutuma

Maxwell is a crypto-economic analyst and Blockchain enthusiast, passionate about helping people understand the potential of decentralized technology. I write extensively on topics such as blockchain, cryptocurrency, tokens, and more for many publications. My goal is to spread knowledge about this revolutionary technology and its implications for economic freedom and social good.

Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.

Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.