Tether-Backed Crypto Firm Faces Fraud Accusations From Former Executives

Coingapestaff
July 5, 2024 Updated October 22, 2024
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
USDT Issuer Tether Unveils AI SDK Platform Boosting Crypto Trading

Highlights

  • Northern Data, supported by Tether, faces a lawsuit from former executives accusing it of financial misrepresentation and tax evasion.
  • Allegations include significant tax liabilities, limited cash reserves, and concerns raised by former auditor KPMG.
  • The lawsuit could impact investor confidence in the crypto and AI sectors, leading to increased regulatory scrutiny.

Northern Data, a prominent crypto and AI infrastructure company backed by Tether, is facing serious fraud allegations from two former executives. The lawsuit, filed in California, accuses the company of financial misrepresentation and tax evasion. These allegations have potentially far-reaching consequences, threatening not only Northern Data’s operations but also its plans for a multi-billion dollar US IPO.

The case raises significant concerns about transparency and accountability in both the cryptocurrency and AI sectors. If proven true, these allegations could severely impact investor confidence in these industries. Moreover, it may lead to increased regulatory scrutiny, potentially reshaping the landscape of crypto and AI businesses.

Details of the Lawsuit and Financial Irregularities

The lawsuit against Northern Data was filed by Joshua Porter and Gulsen Kama, former high-ranking executives of the company. They claim they were terminated after raising concerns about alleged financial misrepresentation and tax evasion by Northern Data’s CEO and COO.

According to the plaintiffs, Northern Data was falsely portraying its financial strength to investors, regulators, and business partners. They allege that the company was “borderline insolvent” with significant tax liabilities and limited cash reserves. Specifically, they claim Northern Data had a $30 million German tax liability and additional liabilities of almost $8 million, while having only $17 million in cash and a monthly burn rate of $3-4 million.

The lawsuit also accuses Northern Data of “rampant tax evasion,” potentially owing tens of millions of dollars in US taxes. These allegations are particularly damaging as Northern Data was reportedly exploring a US IPO for its AI cloud computing and data center businesses, with potential valuations ranging from $10 billion to $16 billion.

Further raising suspicions, the complaint details concerns raised by KPMG, Northern Data’s former auditor, about the company’s liquidity position. Subsequently, Northern Data changed auditors to a small Stuttgart-based law firm, Liebhart & Kollegen. The company has also delayed the publication of its 2023 audited financials to July 12, 2024, fueling more questions about its financial status.

Also Read: German Govt. Offloads Another 547 Bitcoins, Rejects Lawmaker’s Suggestion

Tether’s Involvement and Industry Implications

Tether’s 51% ownership stake in Northern Data, acquired through a strategic investment in 2023, places it at the center of this controversy. As a major player in the cryptocurrency world, Tether’s involvement could have significant implications for the broader crypto market.

The lawsuit and its potential outcomes could impact investor confidence not just in Northern Data, but in the cryptocurrency and AI sectors as a whole. It highlights the challenges of maintaining financial transparency and regulatory compliance in these rapidly evolving industries.

Northern Data’s successful petition to redact portions of the complaint, citing attorney-client privilege, adds another layer of complexity to the case. This move may raise further questions about transparency and could influence how the case is perceived by the public and potential investors.

As the case unfolds, it will likely draw attention from regulators and industry observers. The outcome could potentially shape future regulatory approaches to cryptocurrency and AI companies, especially concerning financial reporting and corporate governance practices.

Also Read: Justin Sun Faces $66M Loss As Ethereum Records 10% Fall, Here’s Why

Tether and BTguru’s Collaboration in Turkey

The MoU between Tether and BTguru marks a significant step towards integrating digital assets into mainstream financial operations in Turkey. The agreement outlines plans to create educational initiatives to acquaint private and public stakeholders with the benefits of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technologies. These programs aim to elevate the understanding and responsible use of these technologies across diverse sectors.

Furthermore, Tether and BTguru are set to investigate the potential of peer-to-peer (P2P) technologies. They will leverage BTguru’s extensive network to facilitate dialogues with critical financial institutions, aiming to foster broader acceptance and integration of digital assets within traditional banking frameworks. This partnership aspect underscores a strategic move to bridge the gap between conventional banking and the evolving crypto landscape.

Also Read: Coinbase, MicroStrategy & Bitcoin Miners Stocks Extend Losses Ahead US Job Data

Advertisement
coingape google news

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more… to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

Newsletter
Your crypto brief.
Delivered every day.
  • Insights that move markets
  • 100,000 active subscribers
By signing-up you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
About Author
About Author
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.