The Pokemon Company Sues Aussie Studio Over Fake NFTs

The Pokemon Company International is suing Pokemon Pty Ltd over the promotion of a new NFT-based Pokemon mobile game. Pokemon Pty Ltd is an Australian business that set up and advertised a website under the name Kotiota Studios. However, it claimed to be launching a cryptocurrency game called PokeWorld.
The Pokemon Company International (TPCI) won orders in federal court on Wednesday prohibiting Parramatta-based developers Kotiota from using well-known characters from video games, movies, and television in their software. However, it is going to release non-fungible tokens bearing the Pokémon name and make claims that the company has a connection to TPCI.
There is still access to the PokeWorld website. In order to prevent Pokemon Pty Ltd from launching the game and selling any NFTs that use their intellectual property. The Pokemon Company International has asked the court to seek a ruling that will forbid Pokemon Pty Ltd from using its trademarks on the website and social media.
The Pokemon Company was concerned about the Pokemon NFT launch
TPCI has stated that Kotiota did not work on the most recent Pokemon games, Pokemon Violet and Pokemon Scarlet. However, Kotiota has claimed on its website to be working on it.
In November, TPCI learned about a website called PokeWorld that Xiaoyan Liu, the CEO of Kotiota, had registered. The website made plans public for the January 2019 release of NFTs and a game based on cryptocurrency.
TPCI was particularly concerned about the introduction of NFTs. According to documents filed, TPCI and Nintendo had “deliberately decided” not to participate in the NFT market.
Pokemon rights are owned by TPCI
When TPCI first tried to stop Kotiota from using Pokemon, it hired a cybersecurity company to locate Kotiota’s offices in Parramatta. However, the company was unable to locate anyone in the building.
The rights to Pokemon are owned by The Pokemon Company International, not the other business. At this point, Pokemon Pty Ltd must cease all operations, including game promotion. The court claims that TPCI has a compelling case and requests more details before discussing costs or damages. Further legal action may be taken if they don’t respond.
Also Read: Top 5 Sports Personalities Who Own NFT In 2022; Here List
- Blockchain for Good Alliance and UNDP AltFinLab Launch Blockchain Impact Forum
- ‘Trump Insider Whale’ Increases Bitcoin Short As U.S. Counters China in New Australia Deal
- Trump Advisor Hints US Government Shutdown Could End This Week, Opening Door for XRP ETF Ruling
- Ethereum’s Vitalik Buterin Responds to Allegations of Excessive Control By ETH Inner Circle
- Solana News: Gemini Launches SOL Edition Credit Card Following XRP Card Success
- Ethereum Price Targets $8K Amid John Bollinger’s ‘W’ Bottom Signal and VanEck Staked ETF Filing
- Pi Coin Price Eyes 50% Upswing As AI-Powered App Studio Update Ignites Optimism
- Bitcoin Price Prediction as Gaussian Channel Turns Green Amid U.S.–China Trade Progress and Fed Rate Cut Hopes
- Solana Price Prediction: Analyst Notes Bearish Breakdown Amid Derivatives Slowdown
- Shiba Inu Price Eyes Recovery as Burn Rate Jumps 10,785% – Can SHIB Hit $0.000016?
- Ethereum (ETH) Price Prediction: Analyst Eyes $7,000 by Q4 as Bitmine Accumulates $281M ETH — Will History Repeat Itself?