Crypto News

Top News: Is BAYC Misleading Investors With Bogus NFT IP Claims?

Published by
Top News: Is BAYC Misleading Investors With Bogus NFT IP Claims?

BAYC (Bored Ape Yacht Club) is one of the most notable NFT collections within the crypto space. NFTs have gained traction in recent years, as several celebrities such as rapper Snoop Dogg show increasing interest in them.

People purchase NFTs with the hope of gaining complete rights to the tokens. However, a recent Galaxy Digital Research shows that might not be the case most of the time.

Advertisement

Yuga Labs allegedly provides no transfer of IP rights to purchasers of BAYC

On Friday, Mike Novogratz’s investment firm Galaxy Digital released a research article on the NFT industry. The company looked to survey NFT licensing in the industry and bust the falsehoods surrounding it. The research highlighted the growing interest in NFTs and noted that the industry likely has a “bright future.”

Nonetheless, it pointed out that, in most cases, when buyers purchase NFTs, they do not receive the appropriate IP rights.

We reviewed the licenses for all of the top NFT collections, and in all cases, except one, the issuers offer only a usage license to the NFT purchaser,

the research article says.

During the research, Galaxy Digital discovered that the proper commercial rights to BAYC and other collections by Yuga Labs are allegedly not transferred to purchasers of the NFTs. This stems from an alleged contradiction in Yuga Labs’ terms of ownership.

According to Yuga Labs, when one purchases a BAYC NFT, one owns the underlying Bored Ape “completely.” Notwithstanding, there is absolutely no provision for transfer of intellectual property (IP) rights to the purchaser of the BAYC, the article claims. This indicates that, in a legal sense, the purchaser allegedly owns no IP rights to the BAYC. The same issue exists with other collections like MAYC and BAKC.

Advertisement

Moonbirds NFTs appear to have the same issue

In addition to this, popular satirist Ryder Ripps had been in the news a few months back due to issues with Yuga Labs. Yuga Labs had sued him for “scamming” consumers with copycat NFTs. Apparently, Ripps created a mimicked version of the BAYC collection which he dubbed RR/BAYC. According to Ripps, this was an attempt to prove that BAYC owners do not really get proper copyrights to their NFTs.

Besides Yuga Labs and the BAYC collection, Galaxy Digital noted another NFT collection that has similar copyright issues. This was the Moonbirds NFT collection, issued by PROOF Collective. The research notes that there is a discrepancy between PROOF Collective’s public statement and the Moonbirds’ license agreement.

The research argues that the issuers of the NFTs—in this case, Yuga Labs and PROOF Collective—are the real owners of the rarity trait. “To truly own that rarity trait, it’s not enough to simply own the digital token entitling you to a license, for the license could change at any time,” it adds.

Notwithstanding, the research mentions that the World of Women (WoW) collection stands out among the bunch. It highlighted that it is the only collection that grants complete IP rights to purchasers of NFTs.

Advertisement
Share
Abigal Vee

Abigal .V. is a cryptocurrency writer with over 4-years of writing experience. She focuses on news writing, and is skilled in sourcing hot topics. She’s a fan of cryptocurrencies and NFTs.

Published by
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Recent Posts

  • Crypto News

Breaking: Rep. Max Miller Unveils Crypto Tax Bill, Includes De Minimis Rules for Stablecoins

Rep. Max Miller is circulating a 14-page draft of a proposed crypto tax bill in…

December 20, 2025
  • Crypto News

XRP Holders Eye ‘Institutional Grade Yield’ as Ripple Engineer Details Upcoming XRPL Lending Protocol

Ripple engineer Edward Hennis has provided key details about the upcoming XRP Ledger (XRPL) lending…

December 20, 2025
  • Crypto News

Michael Saylor Sparks Debate Over Bitcoin’s Quantum Risk as Bitcoiners Dismiss It as ‘FUD’

Strategy co-founder Michael Saylor earlier this week commented on the risk of quantum computing to…

December 20, 2025
  • Crypto News

Ethereum Faces Selling Pressure as BitMEX Co-Founder Rotates $2M Into DeFi Tokens

Ethereum is under new sell pressure after a high-profile crypto trader sold his ETH assets…

December 20, 2025
  • Gambling

Best Crypto Casinos in Germany 2025

If you’re a German gambler tired of strict limits and slow payouts at locally licensed…

December 20, 2025
  • Crypto News

Tom Lee’s Fundstrat Warns Clients Bitcoin Could Fall to $60,000 Despite His ATH Public Forecast

Top asset manager Fundstrat has advised its private clients to expect a pullback in Bitcoin…

December 20, 2025