Tornado Cash Co-Founder Requests Trial Delay For Fair Battle

Roman Storm, co-founder of Tornado Cash, is pushing for a delay in his upcoming trial. His legal team argues that the intricacy and vast evidence involved require more time for adequate preparation. This is Roman Storm’s first request for a postponement, as his defense faces a trial originally scheduled for September 23, 2024, but is now seeking a start in early 2025.

Tornado Cash Co-Founder Seeks More Time Due To Case Complexities

Roman Storm’s legal team has submitted a request to U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla to delay his trial. Notably, they argue that the complexity of the case and the volume of evidence require more time to prepare effectively.

In addition, the defense states that this case, involving sophisticated legal and factual issues, requires postponement to early 2025. This request is driven by the extensive discovery process, including millions of pages of documents, some in Russian requiring translation.

In a letter to Judge Failla, Tornado Cash co-founder’s attorneys cited the need for additional time to analyze the evidence thoroughly and prepare their defense. They mentioned that the defense team is diligently working through the documents but requires further analysis and expert consultations.

Meanwhile, the ongoing complexities are not limited to document translation. According to Roman Storm’s legal team, the intricate legal arguments, including motions to dismiss, suppress, and compel, also contribute to the need for additional preparation time.

These motions are scheduled for an oral argument on July 12, 2024. Notably, Storm’s defense anticipates further discovery productions, adding to the already substantial workload.

Also Read: Spot Bitcoin ETFs See $143 Million Inflows on Friday, Institutions Buying The Dips?

Government Opposes Delay As Defense Seeks Fair Trial

Despite Roman Storm’s request for more time, the government opposes the continuance. Prosecutors argue that the trial should proceed as scheduled to maintain the momentum of the judicial process.

However, Storm’s defense insists that without the delay, his right to a fair trial could be compromised due to inadequate preparation time. Besides, the defense’s appeal emphasizes the need for a comprehensive review of evidence and adequate time to prepare for trial.

In addition, they argue that rushing through the proceedings could result in an incomplete defense, potentially affecting the outcome of the trial for Roman Storm. This stance reflects the high stakes involved in Storm’s case, where the ability to present a well-prepared defense could be crucial to the verdict.

Meanwhile, Judge Failla is expected to address this request in an upcoming hearing. The outcome will determine whether Roman Storm’s trial will proceed as scheduled in September or be delayed to early 2025, allowing his legal team the additional time they argue is essential for ensuring a fair trial.

Also Read: GameStop Stock Falls Further, Roaring Kitty’s Impact Wanes