US Election: Philadelphia Moves To Block Elon Musk’s $1 Million Giveaway

Philly DA filed a lawsuit against Musk-controlled PAC to stop the billionaire from giving away $1M to US Election voters in swing states.
By Teuta Franjkovic
US Election: Elon Musk Wins Lawsuit Over PAC's $1M Voter Giveaway

Highlights

  • The Philadelphia DA is suing Elon Musk's America PAC to stop its $1 million giveaway to registered voters.
  • The lawsuit claims the giveaway violates Pennsylvania law by operating as an unauthorized lottery and employing deceptive practices.
  • The DA argues that the giveaway could interfere with the integrity of elections and compromise voter privacy.

The Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office has filed a lawsuit against a political action committee controlled by billionaire Elon Musk to stop it from giving away $1 million to registered US Election voters in swing states.

District Attorney Larry Krasner filed the lawsuit just days after the US Department of Justice warned Musk’s America PAC that the $1 million sweepstakes may violate federal election laws.

The civil suit, filed in Philadelphia County’s Court of Common Pleas, named Tesla CEO Elon Musk and America PAC as defendants.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Philly DA: Musk’s Giveaway Threatens US Election Integrity

On Monday, the District Attorney for Philadelphia Larry Krasner asked a state judge to block the tech billionaire Elon Musk’s controversial $1 million giveaway targeting registered voters in the coming 2024 US Election.

Krasner is a Democrat and self-described progressive prosecutor. He brought the civil suit against Musk and his pro-Trump organization, America PAC.

As Krasner said:

“The Philadelphia District Attorney is charged with protecting the public from public nuisances and unfair trade practices, including illegal lotteries. The DA is also charged with protecting the public from interference with the integrity of elections.”

Last week, the US DOJ has also warned Musk’s America PAC concerning its ongoing $M voter lottery, suggesting potential law violations. This, however, met a criticism by Dogecoin co-founder Billy Markus, who described the DOJ actions as politically motivated. He added that they resemble tactics often associated with authoritarian regimes.

Advertisement
Advertisement

A Giveaway Too Good to Be True – Legal Challenge Filed

The lawsuit also claims that Musk said to give a $1 million prize to registered voters who provided personal information. These data include an address, phone number, email address and a signed petition pledging support for the Constitution.

The suit argues that America PAC and Musk are inducing the citizens of Philadelphia and residents in the Commonwealth and other swing states to give up personal information and a political commitment in return for an opportunity to win $1 million dollars.

It calls that set up a lottery and claims it is “undoubtedly an illegal one.” According to the lawsuit, Pennsylvania law requires all of the state’s lotteries to be conducted by state officials. It also alleges Musk’s lottery runs afoul of Pennsylvania’s consumer protection laws. It reportedly consists deceptive, ambiguous, or unclear statements likely to confuse or mislead.

Michael Morse, an assistant law professor at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, recently also wondered if Musk’s actions were legal. He said that this approach is legally dubious at best. Federal law bars payments to induce someone to register to vote, but Morse said a petition could be considered an inducement to register to vote.

Advertisement
Advertisement

DA Krasner: PAC is a Threat to Public Interest and Election Integrity

Krasner emphasized the Philadelphia DA’s responsibilities include protecting the public from public nuisances, unfair trade practices, and illegal lotteries.

He noted the DA’s role also involves safeguarding the public from actions that could compromise the integrity of elections.

Earlier, America PAC faced brief investigations by the North Carolina Attorney General’s office and the Michigan Secretary of State’s office. It was revealed PAC was gathering data from swing-state voters under the false pretense of assisting with voter registration.

In response to these inquiries, the PAC promised to address and correct several dead-end links on its website.

Advertisement
Teuta Franjkovic
Teuta is a seasoned writer and editor with over 15 years of expertise in macroeconomics, technology, and the crypto and blockchain sectors. She began her career in 2005 as a lifestyle writer for *Cosmopolitan* before transitioning to business and economic reporting for renowned outlets like *Forbes* and *Bloomberg*. Inspired by thought leaders like Don and Alex Tapscott and Laura Shin, Teuta embraced blockchain's potential, viewing cryptocurrency as one of humanity's most transformative innovations. Since 2014, she has specialized in fintech, focusing on crypto, blockchain, NFTs, and Web3. Known for her strong collaboration and communication skills, Teuta also holds dual MAs in Political Science and Law.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.