VanEck’s Spot Solana ETF Can Face SEC Rejection Due to One Huge Risk

Bhushan Akolkar
June 28, 2024 Updated May 6, 2025
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Could Solana Mimic Ethereum and Surge to $1,000? Analysts Weigh In

Highlights

  • VanEck's bold move to file for a spot Solana ETF on June 27 highlights significant risks.
  • It notes concentrated ownership of SOL tokens, which could impact market stability.
  • The filing underscores Solana's unique position without a US futures market.
  • Also risks like Solana's Proof of History mechanism causing network outages might be a factor to consider.

On Thursday, June 27, investment firm VanEck made a bold move by filing for the spot Solana ETF with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). While several market participants have started predicting the timeline for the approval, VanEck’s filing has some important details that mention the risks involved.

Spot Solana ETF Faces Risk of Concentrated SOL Ownership

Unlike Bitcoin and Ethereum VanEck’s proposal of spot Solana ETF is unique since there are no Solana futures trading in the US to accompany it. Besides, unlike other ETF applications, VanEck’s filing also lists a specific risk of concentrated ownership of SOL tokens.

VanEck’s filing notes that by November 2023, the 100 largest Solana wallets held nearly one-third of all the SOL in circulation. “As a result of this concentration of ownership, large sales or distributions by such holders could have an adverse effect on the market price,” noted VanEck.

Token decentralization is of utmost importance to investors and regulators. Thus, this concentrated ownership of Solana might not go well with the SEC and could be a roadblock in the approval of the VanEck Solana ETF.

Earlier this year while approving the spot Bitcoin ETF, SEC Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw also expressed similar concern about ownership in Bitcoin, explaining why she dissented from the approval.

Around 16% of all Bitcoin in circulation is held by the top 107 wallets, which is about half the concentration seen in Solana. Similarly, the top 100 Ethereum wallets have 19% of the ETH supply.

However, Matthew Sigel, VanEck’s head of digital assets research has dismissed the concerns stating that the Solana blockchain network itself is decentralized.

Also Read: Will Solana and Ether Outshine Bitcoin in the Near Term Amid ETF Hype?

Another Major Risk With Solana

VanEck has also identified another specific related to Solana, related to its unique Proof of History consensus mechanism. Although the Proof of History allows Solana to process transactions faster than other blockchains like Ethereum, it has also been victim to several hours of long network outages due to issues with PoH in recent years. The SEC might take this into consideration while deciding on spot Solana ETF approval.

Well, it seems that participants have decided to look past these issues as of now. Soon after the news of the filing, the Solana price surged in double digits rallying all the way to $150. Currently, the SOL price continues to hold closer to these levels.

Also read: Wall Street Embraces Altcoins With Solana ETF

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
Bhushan is a seasoned crypto writer with over eight years of experience spanning more than 10,000 contributions across multiple platforms like CoinGape, CoinSpeaker, Bitcoinist, Crypto News Flash, and others. Being a Fintech enthusiast, he loves reporting across Crypto, Blockchain, DeFi, Global Macros with a keen understanding in financial markets. 

He is committed to continuous learning and stays motivated by sharing the knowledge he acquires. In his free time, Bhushan enjoys reading thriller fiction novels and occasionally explores his culinary skills. Bhushan has a bachelors degree in electronics engineering, however, his interest in finance and economics drives him to crypto and blockchain.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.