Veteran Trader Peter Brandt Says “MSTR Could Go Underwater” If Bitcoin Repeats 1977 Soybean Crash

Michael Adeleke
3 hours ago
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Peter Brandt says Bitcoin’s chart resembles 1977 soybeans, hinting at a major correction that could hit MSTR.

Highlights

  • Veteran trader Peter Brandt compared Bitcoin’s current price structure to the 1977 soybean crash.
  • Brandt noted that such a drop could leave MSTR deeply underwater.
  • He balanced his outlook, suggesting Bitcoin could either rise to $250,000 or fall toward $60,000.

Veteran trader Peter Brandt has drawn a comparison between Bitcoin’s current price pattern and the 1977 soybean crash. The trader suggested that if BTC were to follow the same pattern, Strategy’s stock, MSTR, could face deep losses.

Peter Brandt Draws Parallels Between Bitcoin and 1977 Soybeans

In a post on X, Peter Brandt noted that soybeans in 1977 formed a broadening top before plunging by 50%. This is a pattern he now sees unfolding in Bitcoin’s charts. He also shared that the MSTR stock could decline rapidly.

The trader went on to caution that many investors take risk per trade, saying, “Anyone who bets 5% of their pot per trade will self-destruct. It’s just a question of time.” According to him, his analysis balances two opposing narratives. He stated that the coin will either climb to $250,000 or drop back toward $60,000.

However, another expert, TheMarketSniper, argued that while the chart patterns appear similar, the implications differ. 

Source: X

In a rare show of humility, Peter Brandt responded, acknowledging that both interpretations could hold merit. “I’ll be first to admit you could be right,” he replied. “If BTC goes up, I want to be long; if it goes down, I want to be short.” 

This cautious tone comes after Brandt’s earlier bullish outlook. Just weeks ago, the veteran analyst had expressed confidence that Bitcoin, along with Ethereum, XRP, and Stellar (XLM), was still in an active bull phase. He backed his view with a chart showing that the coin’s broader bullish structure is still intact.

Now, however, his warning about a potential 50% decline suggests a more nuanced view. He shared that technical risks could test investor conviction, particularly for leveraged plays like MSTR.

Diverging Views as BTC Nears “Peak Zone”

Last week, market analyst Crypto₿irb warned that the Bitcoin bull run could be nearing exhaustion. His “Cycle Peak Countdown” model claims that the market is 99.3% through its current cycle, with a potential top arriving within days. 

Source: X

According to him, institutional profit-taking and cooling on-chain metrics point to a possible end-of-cycle pullback before the final euphoric leg.

At the same time, Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) has reignited the classic Bitcoin vs Gold debate. He predicted that the digital asset would eventually surpass gold’s $30 trillion valuation. In his words, “Prediction: Bitcoin will flip gold. I don’t know exactly when. Might take some time, but it will happen.” 

Notably, experts have highlighted that a market rotation may be underway, with investors shifting capital from gold into BTC. This comes as gold saw its steepest single-day drop since 2013.

Peter Brandt’s caution is significant for Strategy (MSTR), which has more than 200,000 BTC on its balance sheet. A 50% drop in the coin could put pressure on the company’s leveraged strategy and drastically devalue its assets.

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
Michael Adeleke is a passionate crypto journalist known for breaking down complex blockchain concepts and market trends into clear, engaging narratives. He specializes in delivering timely news and sharp market analysis that keeps crypto enthusiasts informed and ahead of the curve. With an engineering background and a degree from the University of Ibadan, Michael brings analytical depth and precision to every piece he writes.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.