Sign Up on MEXC
Highlights
- Layer 3 help to mitigate costs with batch publishing and deposits.
- Layer 3 offer customized functionality like privacy but don't improve overall scalability.
- L3 solutions cater to weakly-trusted scaling, exemplified by validiums.
Recently, a lot of discussion around the Layer 3 solutions has been gathering steam with some of the top industry players joining the debate. Last Sunday, Polygon Labs CEO Marc Boiron stated that Layer 3 solutions aren’t essential for scalability and fail to add much value to the Ethereum ecosystem. Now, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin also shares a similar view in this regard.
Ethereum Layer 3s Don’t Improve Throughput Considerably
Vitalik Buterin stated that Layer 3 solutions do not inherently enhance throughput to a significant degree, but they can help mitigate certain fixed costs associated with batch publishing and deposits/withdrawals.
Buterin shared his previous blog post dating back to September 2022 that explains three different versions of Layer 3s and their importance within the Ethereum ecosystem. He noted:
- Layer 2 (L2) solutions are primarily for general scaling purposes, focusing on enhancing the overall scalability of applications. On the other hand, Layer 3 (L3) solutions provide customized functionality, such as privacy features. The approach here isn’t about achieving “scalability squared,” but rather, it involves one layer of the stack dedicated to scaling applications, with separate layers addressing the specific functional needs of different use cases.
- L2 facilitates general-purpose scaling, while L3 offers tailored scaling solutions. Customized scaling can manifest in various forms, including specialized applications utilizing computation methods other than the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), or rollups optimizing data compression for specific applications by separating data from proofs and potentially replacing proofs with a single SNARK per block.
- Moreover, L2 solutions focus on trustless scaling, predominantly through rollups, while L3 solutions cater to weakly-trusted scaling, exemplified by validiums. Validiums employ SNARKs for computation verification but delegate data availability to a trusted third party or committee. Despite their lower security grade compared to rollups, validiums offer cost-effective scalability solutions, making them particularly suitable for certain applications, such as enterprise blockchains.
Buterin further added that “there are other, potentially “lighter”, ways to get the same cost savings that you get from L3s”.
Advertisement
- Bitcoin Treasuries Add Nearly $1B BTC This Week as Holdings Cross 1M BTC
- Peter Schiff Criticizes Bitcoin’s Performance Following Gold’s Rally To New ATH
- Arkham Uncovers $5 Billion in Untouched Bitcoin From Germany’s Movie2K Seizure
- Ethereum Spot ETFs Record $447 Million in Outflows Amid Crypto Market Decline
- World Liberty Financial Discloses Reason for Blacklisting 272 Wallets
- HBAR Price Forecast: Analyst Targets 123% Rally as ETF Approval Odds Hit 90%
- Solana Price Prediction: Will Solana Hit $320 as SOL Strategies Gains Nasdaq Approval?
- XRP Price Forecast: Analyst Eyes $127 as BlackRock Joins Ripple Swell 2025
- Chainlink Price Eyes $55 as Reserve Holdings Jump With 43,937 LINK Addition
- Cardano Price Targets 30% Surge as Top Economist Calls for Fed Cut
Bhushan is a seasoned crypto writer with over eight years of experience spanning more than 10,000 contributions across multiple platforms like CoinGape, CoinSpeaker, Bitcoinist, Crypto News Flash, and others. Being a Fintech enthusiast, he loves reporting across Crypto, Blockchain, DeFi, Global Macros with a keen understanding in financial markets.
He is committed to continuous learning and stays motivated by sharing the knowledge he acquires. In his free time, Bhushan enjoys reading thriller fiction novels and occasionally explores his culinary skills.
Bhushan has a bachelors degree in electronics engineering, however, his interest in finance and economics drives him to crypto and blockchain.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.
