Exclusive: Liminal Denies Blame For $230M WazirX Hack Despite Forensic Probe

Kritika Mehta
August 19, 2024 Updated August 20, 2024
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
WazirX Hack Arrest: Delhi Police Arrests Suspect In $230 Million Crypto Heist

Highlights

  • WazirX’s forensic investigation found no internal system compromise in the $230M hack.
  • The breach, targeting a multisig wallet, was attributed to Liminal’s security flaws.
  • Liminal denied these allegations in an official statement released today.

In a recent update on the ongoing WazirX hack investigation, the exchange has declared that its systems and laptops were not compromised during the $230 million cyberattack. This assurance follows a thorough forensic investigation by Mandiant Solutions, a Google subsidiary.

Citing the report, WazirX claimed the issue likely stemmed from its former infrastructure and custody partner, Liminal. However, the custodian has vehemently refuted the claims. Moreover, they raised questions on the exchange’s security systems.

Advertisement
Advertisement

WazirX Exchange Receives Clean Chit After Forensic Probe

WazirX, one of India’s largest crypto exchanges, experienced a significant hack last month. It resulted in the loss of nearly 45% of its holding assets. The attack targeted a multisig wallet, an advanced crypto wallet requiring multiple private keys to authorize transactions. The compromised wallet had six signatories: five from WazirX and one from Liminal.

According to the exchange, “All transactions from the Multisig wallet required approval from three members of WazirX, followed by the final authorization from Liminal.” Despite this, the forensic report stated, “We did not identify evidence of compromise on the three laptops that were used for signing transactions.”

The findings of Mandiant Solutions have led to claims that the WazirX hack was not due to internal failures but rather an issue with Liminal’s security. “The findings largely indicate that the issue leading to the cyberattack originated from Liminal,” the exchange said, according to a MoneyControl report.

The WazirX exchange has expressed full confidence in the forensic investigation and is committed to cooperating fully. Moreover, a spokesperson for the exchange commented:

“We have full faith in the investigating agency and shall cooperate with them to the fullest extent. We are actively working on recovering the stolen funds and are hopeful that those responsible will be brought to justice.”

In response to the WazirX hack, the exchange has implemented several recovery strategies. The platform is exploring options including a Bounty Program offering rewards up to $10,000 worth of USDT. Also, it released a poll to consider user opinion for next steps.

Furthermore, the Indian crypto exchange is engaging with rivals and industry peers for support or a potential buyout. Additionally, the WazirX exchange had earlier approached its former partner Binance. Earlier, Binance controlled a significant portion of its revenue and WRX tokens valued at $80 million.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Liminal’s Stance On These Allegations

In an official statement obtained by Coingape, Limited refrained to comment on the WazirX exchange’s stance “due to the lack of any information on the scope and methodology of the audit they have conducted.” However, they believe that the recent investigation “actually raises serious questions on the security of their network infrastructure, operational custody controls and overall security posture.”

The spokesperson highlighted that the exchange was the custodian for five of the six keys, raising further scrutiny. They added, “As far as our front-end and UI is concerned, our preliminary audit reports categorically indicate no breach in our front-end or UI. Please note that we have empanelled more than one reputed independent auditors to conduct forensic analysis and our detailed reports are expected to arrive within this week.”

Moreover, they remain “confident that the Liminal front-end and UI were not compromised and the report and findings will be shared as soon as they are made available to us.” Furthermore, they invited Mandiant to conduct the UI audit. They stated:

“In the interest of absolute transparency at our end, we have empanelled more than one reputed auditor and are open to empanelling additional auditors, including the likes of Mandiant to conduct the UI audit as well.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Latest Updates By The Exchange

The crypto exchange has also engaged with the Financial Intelligence Unit of India (FIU) and the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) to address the aftermath of the breach. As part of its response, the WazirX exchange initially proposed a “55/45 approach” to mitigate customer losses.

It would allow users to access and trade 55% of their portfolio tokens. Whilst, the remaining 45% user funds would be converted to USDT and locked until fund recovery. However, this proposal faced significant backlash from customers and was eventually scrapped.

Meanwhile, after the WazirX hack fiasco, Liminal is no longer a custody partner for the exchange. Also, the platform completed the restoration of balances by undoing all trades between July 18 and July 21. This action was taken as the platform failed to block unauthorized trades during that period.

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
Kritika boasts over 2 years of experience in the financial news sector. Currently working as a crypto journalist at Coingape, she has consistently shown a knack for blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. Kritika combines insightful analysis with a deep understanding of market trends. With a keen interest in technical analysis, she brings a nuanced perspective to her reporting, exploring the intersection of finance, technology, and emerging trends in the crypto space.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.