XRP Lawsuit Update: Judge Torres’ Ruling To Stand, Says Ex-SEC Lawyer

Marc Fagel, the former SEC lawyer, dismisses the possibilities of Judge Analisa Torres revoking her decision in the XRP lawsuit.
By Nynu V Jamal
XRP Lawsuit: Judge Torres' Ruling To Stand, Says Ex-SEC Lawyer

Highlights

  • Marc Fagel says that Judge Torres will not revoke her judgement on Ripple's liability.
  • Instead, both parties will focus on modifying the remedies.
  • The lawyer dismisses the mysterious filing for decisive evidence as a spam.

The XRP lawsuit is taking unexpected turns as the crypto community eagerly awaits the Ripple vs SEC case settlement. While there are multiple speculations about the Ripple lawsuit’s potential developments, ex-SEC lawyer Marc Fagel suggested that Judge Analisa Torres’ ruling could stand.

Notably, the former SEC lawyer’s comments come amidst a mysterious twist in the XRP lawsuit. Let’s dive into the basis of Marc Fagel’s assertions and his response to the new turn in the XRP lawsuit.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Will Judge Torres Revoke the XRP Lawsuit Ruling?

Despite both the US SEC and Ripple taking steps that could lead to a conclusion in the XRP lawsuit, uncertainty still surrounds the outcome. There are numerous rumors and speculations about the case’s potential developments. One such scenario is the possibility of Judge Analisa Torres revoking the existing judgment on Ripple’s liability.

However, ex-SEC lawyer Marc Fagel dismissed the possibility of such a development. According to Fagel, Judge Torres will not revoke her ruling. Instead, the parties involved in XRP lawsuit will focus on modifying the remedies. The SEC lawyer’s comments have drawn significant attention, with many focusing on the potential shift in emphasis to penalties and remedies.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Ex-SEC Lawyer Dismisses Unusual Filing as Spam

In a surprising twist, a mysterious filing in the XRP lawsuit has raised concerns and speculations. An individual named Justin W. Keener submitted a request to present “decisive evidence” in the Ripple vs SEC lawsuit. He posited that the critical information favors both Ripple and Americans, sparking much attention. The ambiguous nature of the filing has invoked further intrigue as the mentioned evidence remains unclear.

While prominent figures came forward commenting on the unusual filing, Marc Fagel dismissed it as a spam. He wrote on an X post,

It’s not really that. It’s a filing by someone not authorized to appear in the case. It’s the equivalent of spam getting through the court’s filter, and will be deleted.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Is the XRP Lawsuit Settlement Imminent?

As Ripple has dropped its cross-appeal in response to the SEC’s appeal withdrawal, the community remains confident that the conclusion is imminent. However, citing possible reasons, experts point out a potential delay in the settlement with a few steps pending.

As per legal expert Fred Rispoli, the Ripple vs SEC case could be concluded within two months. Despite these anticipations, it needs to be seen how the Ripple lawsuit would ultimately end.

Advertisement
Nynu V Jamal
Nynu V Jamal is a Senior Journalist at CoinGape. She boasts more than 3 years of experience in content writing, with expertise in crypto and blockchain. She has contributed to platforms like CoinEdition and CryptoTale, demonstrating her proficiency in navigating the dynamic crypto landscape. Beyond her journalistic pursuits, Nynu is a literary enthusiast, having served as an Assistant Professor of English Language and Literature. She is a Master's degree holder in English Literature and a UGC NET qualifier. Her academic background has enabled her to publish research papers on literature, while also nurturing her creative side as a published poet. Her creative side extends to music, crafts, and art, which she actively explores. Her unique blend of analytical and creative skills allows her to craft engaging stories that captivate audiences. Stay updated with Nynu on LinkedIn
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.