XRP Lawsuit: Settlement speculations rise upon SEC request for an extension to file seal

By Sunil Sharma
SEC vs. Ripple Lawsuit

The latest update in the XRP lawsuit saw the SEC appeal for an extension to file for its letter motion to seal certain portions of Ripple’s objections and responses to the SEC’s second and third sets of interrogatories, submitted as exhibits for the Court’s consideration in support of the SEC’s letter opposing Defendants’ letter motion to compel further responses to interrogatories.

However, the reason why the market has been flooded with settlement speculations again is because of the SEC’s meet and confer mention in its appeal letter. The plaintiff stated that before adding portions to seal the plaintiff will be conferring with the defendants. The portions to seal are pertaining to the third parties’ submissions to the SEC that the SEC believes may merit sealing. This brings us back to the SEC approaching Ripple for a seal to protect certain eminent individuals’ secrets hidden in the exhibits.

Yesterday, the lawsuit saw SEC file a letter stating that it “does not oppose” Ripple’s request to seal parts of certain exhibits in the Interrogatories dispute. Furthermore, the plaintiff also noted that a letter of appeal to file its own motion to seal is expected in the interrogatories dispute by September 24, 2021.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Speculations rise again with yet another seal

While both parties have fought their ends of the arguments in the interrogatories dispute, they are back together in filing for a seal. However, this will not be the first time that the case witnesses both, Ripple and SEC join forces. Earlier in the XRP lawsuit, a similar seal collaboration was seen in the DPP dispute.

It was speculated that Ripple negotiated a deal with the SEC to get protection, while the commission got another shot at pursuing further litigation against other crypto projects without the burden of legal precedent. Furthermore, SEC is also accused of appealing for a seal to protect an eminent ex-official of the commission, Hinman.

Advertisement
Sunil Sharma
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.