XRP Lawyer Claims SEC Opting This Tactic To Win Lawsuits

John Deaton in a Twitter thread explained the SEC’s complete pattern of investigation and suing the firms. He called it SEC Modus Operandi.
By Ashish Kumar
SEC to Close Office Involved in Failed DEBT Box Crypto Lawsuit

The global crypto industry is trading in volatility as regulators are still looking to provide clarity over it. In the meantime, lawyer John Deaton, Amicus Curies in SEC vs Ripple Case has laid down the pattern US SEC is following to win the lawsuits against firms.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Is SEC following a pattern?

John Deaton in a Twitter thread explained the SEC’s complete pattern of investigation and suing the firms. He called it SEC Modus Operandi.

He highlighted that Brad Garlinghouse, Ripple CEO said that they will be spending around $100 million on legal fees. While LBRY Jeremy Kaufman has spent one third of their fund on legal fees.

However, Dragonchain went on to spend $2-$4 million in legal fees before the case. Now, the firm is facing a long and expensive legal battle against the SEC.

XRP lawyer highlighted that he was critical of BlockFi’s extortion payment to the SEC Chair. He brought up that Zac Prince agreed to pay $100 million for pre suit settlement. While Ripple was investigated by the commission for 30 months that too before the filing was filed.

He informed that Ripple offered to settle however the SEC refused to do it.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Watchdog makes defendants tap out

Deaton said that LBRY was investigated for around 3 years before filing of the lawsuit and no fraud. Meanwhile, LBRY offered to settle the dispute. This offer included dissolving the Corporation and selling the founder’s assets at auction. He added that anything short of registering LBC as a security but the SEC also refused.

Now, after almost 4 years and after being informed that the Commission inquiry was over. However, No fraud was found and the SEC decides to close the case. Meanwhile, they went on to file a lawsuit against DragonChian with a claim that all DRGNs are securities.

He suggested that the commission investigate the target for years causing them millions in legal fees. After this, they sue them when firms are left with limited resources.

Advertisement
Ashish Kumar
Ashish believes in Decentralisation and has a keen interest in evolving Blockchain technology, Cryptocurrency ecosystem, and NFTs. He aims to create awareness around the growing Crypto industry through his writings and analysis. When he is not writing, he is playing video games, watching some thriller movie, or is out for some outdoor sports. Reach me at [email protected]
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.