Year Ender: Top 5 Biggest Crypto Villains In 2022

Coingapestaff
December 30, 2022
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Crypto Villains

This decade’s starting two years ended up being the worst in human history. This year, people have high hopes. However, 2022 ended up being just another hopeless year. The crypto sector has experienced the worst human deceit in 2022. Although there have been fluctuations in the Defi market in the past, nothing has come close to this year’s performance. Considering that no one foresaw it happening, getting on the list of cryptocurrency villains has been challenging.

Since the year’s beginning, cryptocurrency prices have fallen to an all-time low. While the market has not been doing well. The betrayal by one of its own, though, has not been simple. The crypto villain’s list includes some well-known names as well as some surprising ones.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Top 5 biggest crypto villains in 2022

Sam Bankman-Fried

This name is on the list comes as no surprise. The character of Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) has taken an unexpected turn. At FTX and Alameda Research, he was helped in committing the biggest fraud of the century by SBF and his allies. The mainstream media has hardly thrown any softballs at the businessman now known as “Scam Bankrun-Fraud” as investors suffer.

The other people on this list might become irrelevant in a few years, but SBF will live on in the annals of cryptography. However, he won’t just be well-known in the cryptocurrency markets; other financial markets will also recognize him. He ran one of the biggest scams ever, stole money from his customers, sold fake Bitcoin, and gave money to politicians to gain their favor and protection. He turns out to be the biggest crypto villain of 2022.

Alex Mashinsky

The founder and previous CEO of Celsius Network is Alex Mashinsky. One of the biggest cryptocurrency lending platforms ever created. In essence, Celsius ran a Ponzi scheme where money from new client deposits went to people who wanted withdrawals. They never made a profit and were always bankrupt. It would have been terrible enough if that had been the end.

Mashinsky regularly exaggerated the truth and denigrated those who questioned Celsius.

Even two days before Celsius froze withdrawals, he gave several YouTube interviews in which he claimed that everything at Celsius was going great. He also strengthened the idea that banks are unreliable and untrustworthy. He was an advocate for the populace. But it turned out to be a scam, and they filed for bankruptcy while freezing the money of their members by the billions.

Also Read: NFT Avatars: Why Are NFT Avatars So Popular And What To Expect In 2023

Do Kwon

Nearly all of the traits of a villain are exhibited by Do Kwon. Unquestionably, Do Kwon is to blame for the severe damage and suffering that will hinder the cryptocurrency ecosystem for years.

Similar to Bankman-Fried, Kwon was a prodigy who virtually overnight became a superstar. He repeatedly demonstrated his inability to handle fame. His remarks and tweets have drawn criticism ever since Terra LUNA crashed. Although there were severe financial losses and, in the worst cases, suicides as a result of Terra’s fall, Kwon has shown little regret. He repeatedly begged to disappear from crypto forever, but he tried to revive Terra, showing that he still craves attention. He is currently being watched by every nation, including South Korea and Interpol.

Su Zhu and Kyle Davies

One of the biggest and most reputable crypto funds was run by Zhu Su and Kyle Davies under the name 3AC. They gained attention during COVID-19, and many people believed they played a role in the resurgence of the cryptocurrency market that year. However, they would also partake in degen trade and dig a hole they could not escape from.

Considering their flawless market reputation. Everyone wanted to work with them and lend them money. Even if it meant extending a loan to them without any form of security. When Luna/UST fell to zero, 3AC filed for bankruptcy. The worst of it, though, was not this. They were connected to a number of other market participants because of their prominence in the industry. This caused a chain reaction that caused several businesses to go bankrupt.

Gary Gensler and SEC

Gary Gensler was the adversary who could have taken crypto to incredible heights and protected us from the majority of the danger this year.

He did neither instead. Gensler seems to be delaying the adoption of a Bitcoin spot ETF in the US for an unknown reason. He has also refrained from proposing any concrete crypto legislation. He had met with SBF several times, it was recently discovered. They were allegedly working together on a rule that would help FTX.

Also Read: What is NFT Staking? Pros and Cons of NFT Staking.

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.