AI News: Google Gemini Chatbot Implements Restrictions on Election-Related Queries
Highlights
- Google said that it will limit the kinds of election-related questions that users can pose to its Gemini chatbot.
- A recent report by the World Economic Forum shows that 4.2 billion people are about to cast ballots in 2024.
- Misinformation and disinformation pose the greatest threat to stability since they cast doubt on the validity of election outcomes.
Google’s Gemini chatbot will “roll out restrictions on the types of election-related queries” that the AI chatbot would respond to. The news comes after the surge in artificial intelligence (AI)-generated content caused major concerns about disinformation during the election, according to a CNBC article.
Google Restricts Gemini Chatbot Response to Election Queries
According to a blog post by the company, Google said that it will limit the kinds of election-related questions that users can pose to its Gemini chatbot. It also mentioned that the adjustments have already been implemented in the United States and India. These countries are set for elections which will be scheduled for this spring. According to a Google representative who talked with CNBC, the adjustments are consistent with the company’s intended election strategy.
Read Also: CPI Report Reaction: Market Bets on Fed Rate Cut Fall As US Inflation Climbs
AI-Related Misinformation Poses Threat to Elections
A recent report by the World Economic Forum shows that 4.2 billion people are about to cast ballots in 2024. With such a huge number ready to vote, misinformation and deception may be used instead of the intended democratic process in the age of AI. Given the confluence of the “post-truth era,” election procedures, and the recent explosion in generative AI, tech firms, governments, and media outlets need to think carefully about how they can support democratic processes. According to the Global Risks Report 2024, misinformation and disinformation pose the greatest threat to stability since they cast doubt on the validity of election outcomes.
Google’s Gemini Chatbot Faces Roadblock Over Credibility
In recent months, there has been increased criticism of the AI business. The main causes of the problems are numerous concerns with “accuracy” and “credibility” taking center stage. Microsoft’s AI system was recently the subject of criticism after an employee claimed that the system was generating “offensive images.” Furthermore, the allegations align with Google’s detractors. Google was charged with exploiting its Gemini AI tool to produce incorrect photos. Subsequently, Google ceased collecting images of individuals in response to complaints. The main question raised was over how its Gemini AI engine processed images according to racial categories. According to reports, Google acknowledged that they were fixing recent problems with the image-generating function of Gemini. After that, the business decided to give up on photographing people.
Read Also: VanEck Bold Fee Cut Wins $119M Inflow into Bitcoin ETF
- BlackRock Now Holds 3.8% of Bitcoin Supply; Bloomberg Analyst Explains Why It’s ‘Extraordinary’
- KuCoin Secures ISO 27701 Certification, Boosting User Trust and Privacy
- Breaking: SEC Moves To Allow On-Chain Stock Trading Alongside Crypto Amid Tokenization Push
- Analyst Eyes Solana ATH as 21Shares’ SOL-Focused Jupiter ETP Launches on Swiss Exchange
- Experts Predict Big ETH Rally on Bullish Options, Whales Signal Post-False Break
- Analyst Predicts Dogecoin Price Surge as DOGE ETF AUM Hits $20M
- Ethereum Price Eyes $8,600 As Institutions And Whales Double Down
- Dogecoin Price Prediction – Chart Set-Up Highlights Perfect Buying Opportunity With Outflows Backing $0.45
- Bitcoin Price Set to Rebound Ahead of US Government Shutdown, NFP Data
- XRP Price Prediction: How XRP Could React After October 2025 SEC ETF Decisions
- Aster Price Prediction as US President Adds $110M Worth of Tokens to His Portfolio
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
