Australian Regulator Faces Scrutiny Over Lapse to Report HyperVerse Crypto Scheme

The ASIC faces criticism for not warning against the HyperVerse crypto scheme, despite international regulators labeling it a potential scam.
By Shraddha Sharma
Crypto Airdrop Scam

Australia’s consumer watchdog is reportedly under fire for not issuing a warning against the HyperVerse crypto investment scheme. The Guardian quoted Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones criticizing the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). The agency was called out for its lapse even after international regulators flagged the scheme as potentially fraudulent.

Also Read:  Crypto fraud allegations are brought on ACE exchange founder

Advertisement
Advertisement

HyperVerse reported scam

A previous investigation by Guardian Australia also reported substantial losses to retail investors in the HyperVerse scheme. Additionally, the scheme was reportedly dubbed a probable “scam” and a “suspected pyramid scheme.” Chainalysis, in its 2022 analysis of crypto scams, highlighted HyperVerse in its report. It emerged as a top perpetrator by revenue, amassing nearly $1.3 billion.


Jones raised questions about ASIC’s vigilance and response to international warnings. The official also pointed out that counterparts in the UK, New Zealand, Canada, Germany, and Hungary had issued warnings as early as 2021.

“This type of scheme works by convincing innocent people to invest their money into a product that might not exist, with the only source of income being money from new investors,” Jones was quoted as saying.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Scheme chief is reportedly untraceable

HyperVerse, part of the HyperTech group, lured investors with the promise of high returns. Their promised return on investment soon appeared dubious.

The development also follows an investigation by Guardian Australia that suggested Steven Reece Lewis, the alleged chief executive of the potentially fraudulent HyperVerse scheme, maybe a fictitious person.

Lewis, presented with an elaborate profile of achievements, reportedly remains untraceable. The previous report underlined that HyperVerse was promoted by Sam Lee and Ryan Xu. Both were Australian entrepreneurs associated with the now-defunct Australian bitcoin company, Blockchain Global, as per the report.

In light of the recent revelations and as investors deal with the consequences, attention is increasingly focused on how ASIC will refine its regulatory strategies to prevent similar incidents in the future. This concern is heightened by a recent CertiK report that indicated that 2023 witnessed 751 security incidents, resulting in a loss of approximately $1.8 billion in digital assets.

Advertisement
Shraddha Sharma
Shraddha's professional journey spans over five years, during which she worked as a financial journalist, covering business, markets, and cryptocurrencies. As a reporter, she has placed particular emphasis to learn about the market interaction with emerging technologies.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.