MEXCBinance Vs SEC: Judge Announces Multiple Orders, Limits Amicus Curiae Filings
In the ongoing legal clash between the world’s largest exchange Binance and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), a crucial hearing is scheduled for today, October 12. Meanwhile, Judge Amy Jackson made multiple orders to clear pending motions including an amicus brief filed by USDC issuer Circle as the lawsuit enters a crucial phase.
Judge Signs Multiple Orders in Binance Vs SEC
According to several filings dated October 11, Judge Amy Berman Jackson signed multiple orders to clear pending motions in the U.S. SEC v. Binance lawsuit.
Judge Jackson accepts Circle Internet Financial as amicus curiae in support of neither party on defendants Binance and CEO CZ’s motions to dismiss the lawsuit. The USDC issuer claimed that stablecoins are not securities, the SEC lacks authority on payment stablecoins, and legal and practical stakes underscore the SEC’s authority over payment stablecoins.
“Any future motion for leave to file an amicus brief may be accompanied by no more than two motions to appear pro hac vice and must explain why the brief would be helpful or necessary, if it sets forth a position already taken in prior amicus briefs filed in this case,” as per another minute order.
Further, the court reminds that an amicus curiae may participate in oral argument only with the court’s permission.
Judge Jackson also granted motions for leave of attorneys Jeremy Gray, Mark W. Rasmussen, Heath P. Tarbert, Eric Tung, and Daniel Kaleba to appear pro hac vice for their clients. However, lawyers or at least one member of the lawyers’ firms are required to undergo CM/ECF training, obtain a CM/ECF username and password, and agree to file papers electronically.
Binance Seeks To Dismiss the Lawsuit
Binance, its U.S. arm, and CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao filed a motion to dismiss the SEC lawsuit. Defendants claimed that the agency overstepped its authority.
The SEC alleged a range of allegations, including mishandling customer funds, misleading investors and regulators, and violating securities rules. Other crypto firms such as Coinbase are also looking to dismiss the lawsuit alleging that the agency’s attempts to gain authority over the crypto industry.
Also Read:
- Sam Bankman-Fried Requests Clarification And Reconsideration From Court
- Why Ark Invest’s Updated Bitcoin ETF Filing Is Bullish for BTC Price?
- Whales Dumping 55 Mln XRP Stirs Speculation, Price Drop Ahead?
- Changpeng ‘CZ’ Zhao Confirms Defamation Lawsuit Plans Against Sen Elizabeth Warren
- Pi Coin Gains Another 15% As Pi Network Joins ISO 20022 For Seamless Banking Integration
- Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) Makes Record Debut with $69.5M Inflows, $289M NAV
- Trump Insider Whale Reloads $430M Long on BTC, ETH Ahead of Tomorrow’s Fed Rate Cut Decision
- Breaking: $2.6B Western Union Announces Plans for Solana-Powered Stablecoin by 2026
- Pi Network Patterns Point to More Gains Despite Manipulation Claims
- HBAR Price Poised to Hit $0.30 as Canary Capital ETF Starts Trading.
- Will Solana Price Rally to $300 as Bitwise Launches $BSOL ETF?
- XRP Price Chart Patterns Hint at 2017-Style Breakout as Evernorth Acquires $1B XRP Ahead of Nasdaq Debut
- Cardano Price Eyes 80% Rally as x402 Upgrade Sparks Hope for AI Payment Expansion
- Polymarket Traders Bet Ethereum Price to Hit $5,000 as Bullish Pattern Forms
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
