Circle Announces Termination of Individual Accounts by End of November

Circle's decision to end consumer accounts sparks debate as regulatory hurdles with SEC intensify over stablecoin status.
By Maxwell Mutuma
Circle’s USDC Dominance Could Be Bearish for Crypto Market, Here’s Why

Circle, the stablecoin issuer, revealed its plans to terminate individual or consumer accounts by November 30. The information emerged when a crypto enthusiast, Evanss6, shared an image of an email he received from Circle on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter. Consequently, users discovered that functionalities like wiring and minting will cease to be available for these accounts.

Moreover, a representative from the company confirmed this change. The spokesperson stated, 

“Circle is phasing out support for legacy consumer accounts and has notified individual consumers of this decision.”

However, it’s crucial to note that business and institutional Circle Mint accounts are exempt from this change and will continue to function.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Circle’s Move Seen as Preventive Action

As news of Circle’s decision spread across the crypto community, various speculations began to surface on X. Adam Cochran, a known crypto sleuth, inferred that Circle’s move might be a response to a potential depletion of their reserves. He hinted at the presence of a “network of individual accounts” acting as “KYC mules”, which are essentially intermediaries for money laundering. Hence, the decision to shut them down might be a preventive measure.

On the other hand, another crypto trader, tmnxeq, had a different take. According to him, Circle’s action could be a “cost-cutting/ restructuring exercise”. Additionally, Circle’s use of the term “legacy consumer accounts” in their statement might suggest these accounts weren’t generating the traffic or usage they once did.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Circle Faces Regulatory Challenges in U.S.

The company’s recent decision doesn’t exist in a vacuum. The company has been navigating a sea of challenges, particularly from regulatory entities in the U.S. Significantly, their ongoing legal tussle with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has caught the attention of many. The core of the dispute revolves around whether stablecoins, which are linked to other assets to maintain their value stability, should be regulated in the same way as traditional securities. Circle firmly believes they shouldn’t be.

Read Also: XRPL’s Xahau Sidechain Passes Security Audit, What Comes Next?

Advertisement
Maxwell Mutuma
Maxwell is a crypto-economic analyst and Blockchain enthusiast, passionate about helping people understand the potential of decentralized technology. I write extensively on topics such as blockchain, cryptocurrency, tokens, and more for many publications. My goal is to spread knowledge about this revolutionary technology and its implications for economic freedom and social good.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.