Coinbase CLO Challenges Court Ruling In SEC vs Crowd Machine Lawsuit

Coingapestaff
January 24, 2024
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Coinbase CLO Paul Grewal Calls Out FDIC Over Incomplete FOIA Responses

Coinbase and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are currently engaged in a legal battle. Amid the court battle, Coinbase CLO Paul Grewal criticized the recent court ruling for a lawsuit by the SEC against Crowd Machine. This led to a renewed battle on whether tokens should be considered securities or not.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Coinbase CLO Stands Firmly Against Ruling In SEC’s Favor

Grewal opposed the court’s ruling in SEC’s favor in the lawsuit against the issuer of Crowd Machine Compute Tokens. He underscored that the tokens and securities dispute has begun again. Quoting Lawyer Bill Hughes’ tweet about the SEC’s latest lawsuit, the Coinbase CLO questioned, “So the tokens themselves are once again the securities?”

In addition, he highlighted the comments made in front of a Southern District of New York judge last week. He questioned if the comments filed by Coinbase in an open court were “false” since the latest court judgment sided with the SEC while the SDNY ruling is still pending. However, Grewal went on to deem the defendants in the latest case as “fraudsters.”

On the contrary, he further added that having such defendants doesn’t provide a “license for the government to make false statements in federal court.” Moreover, Grewal noted that such ‘false statements’ could leave the Americans even more confused regarding the regulations. Additionally, the Coinbase CLO cited that deciphering “what the SEC actually thinks the law is” has become worse.

Also Read: Coinbase CLO Challenges US Treasury’s Crypto Mixing Rule, Here’s Why

Advertisement
Advertisement

Inside SEC’s Lawsuit Against Crowd Machine Compute Tokens Issuer

On January 17, 2024, the U.S. District Court in Northern California issued an amended final judgment against Crowd Machine, Metavine, and Founder Craig Sproule, following an SEC case. Thereafter, the defendants were ordered to pay $19.6 million plus $3.35 million in prejudgment interest for an unregistered and fraudulent offering of Crowd Machine Compute Tokens (CMCTs).

The SEC’s complaint alleged materially false statements in connection with the token sale. Whilst, the defendants agreed to judgments permanently urging them from violating antifraud provisions and registration regulations. However, the defendants didn’t admit being guilty.

Furthermore, the ruling also included penalties, such as a $195,000 fine for Craig Sproule. In addition, Sproule faced a prohibition on his future service as an officer or director of a public company. Meanwhile, the Coinbase CLO has cleared his stance that he doesn’t support the accused in the case even though he questioned the decision.

Also Read: Coinbase CLO Fires Back At US GAO’s Concerns On Crypto Evasion Of Sanctions

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.