Coinbase Faces Criticism for Withdrawing Support for US CLARITY Act

Coingapestaff
January 16, 2026
Coingapestaff

Coingapestaff

Journalist
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Read full bio
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
CLARITY Act

Highlights

  • Coinbase draws criticism after withdrawing support for the US CLARITY Act.
  • Citron Research claims the move is driven by fear of competition from Securitize.
  • Brian Armstrong says the bill could harm consumers and market competition.

Coinbase is now facing growing criticism for its unexpected pullback from the US CLARITY Act. While the exchange cites policy concerns, critics argue that the decision is driven by the rising competition from Wall Street-backed tokenized firms. What started as a struggle for crypto regulation clarity is now being seen as a power play.

CLARITY Act Controversy: Citron Questions Coinbase’s Pullback

While the Senate has once again delayed the CLARITY Act markup hearing, the focus has now shifted to Coinbase. Critics are questioning the exchange’s motives behind its sudden withdrawal of support for the market structure bill.

Citron Research criticizes Coinbase’s decision, claiming that the exchange is concerned about competition rather than the bill itself. Citron noted in an X post,

“Coinbase wants the benefits of CLARITY without the competition it would create…[Coinbase isn’t] pushing back because the bill is bad for crypto — they’re pushing back because a cleaner version might be better for Securitize than for them.”

The critic posits that Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong is opposing the CLARITY Act not because it harms crypto, but because it could threaten the exchange’s business interests. The exchange is allegedly concerned about the growing competition from Securitize, a tokenized securities firm. According to the criticism, Coinbase doesn’t want the CLARITY Act rules to help competitors grow. Citron added,

“Coinbase wants the benefits of CLARITY without the competition it would create. They’re not pushing back because the bill is bad for crypto – they’re pushing back because a cleaner version might be better for Securitize than for them.$CEPT. Armstrong vs Blackrock and Trump.”

What Brian Armstrong Has to Say?

Despite this backlash, Armstrong asserts that Coinbase withdrew its support for the CLARITY Act due to its ability to harm consumer protection and market competition. He stated, “The high level principle is that you can’t really have banks come in and try and kill their competition at the expense of the American consumer.”

Armstrong added that crypto exchanges, including Coinbase, negotiated with the lawmakers until the final stages. However, the detailed review released late Monday night uncovered provisions that could harm the industry, stated Armstrong.

The Coinbase CEO believes that letting the crypto bill pass in its current form may have a “catastrophic” impact on the broader crypto industry and consumers. He cites this as the major reason for his exchange’s decision to pullback support. With the move, he wanted the lawmakers to revise the bill.

Advertisement
coingape google news

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more… to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

Newsletter
Your crypto brief.
Delivered every day.
  • Insights that move markets
  • 100,000 active subscribers
By signing-up you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
About Author
About Author
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.