‘Coinbase’s SEC Defense is Criminal’, Former SEC Chief Says

John Reed Stark, the former Chief of the SEC Office of Internet Enforcement has faulted the current argument of American publicly traded exchange Coinbase Global Inc as it concerns its defense against the markets regulator. As far as John Reed is concerned, the argument from the trading platform that the regulator approved its Initial Public Offering (IPO) back in 2021 and as such, has a good knowledge of its business is flawed.
Why, IMHO, Coinbase's SEC Defense is Criminal
Coinbase and its shills argue that when Coinbase’s SEC initial public offering (IPO) registration went effective, the SEC somehow also approved the bonafides of Coinbase’s business. What a crock and possibly a criminal offense. Yes,… pic.twitter.com/5QyWYTcA8f
— John Reed Stark (@JohnReedStark) June 10, 2023
John Reed said the role of the SEC as far as IPO filing is concerned is to review whether or not the applying company made the right disclosures. According to the former regulatory Chief, the SEC always issues a bold disclaimer in every prospectus that legally recuses the commission of exactly the same claims that the exchange plans to use as a cover.
For emphasis, John Reed published a sample of the statement which reads;
“The Securities and Exchange Commission and state securities regulators have not approved or disapproved these securities, or determined if the prospectus or this prospectus supplement is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense,” with the bold emphasis added by John Reed.
He added that the SEC’s role is to help investors make their investment decisions based on the availability of the right decision and according to him, Coinbase claiming the commission is aware of its business will not help its defense in the course of the suit.
Coinbase Has a Long Road to Trail
As it stands, Coinbase as an exchange has a very long road to trend as it has two lawsuits pending with the US SEC. First, the trading platform sued the Gary Gensler-led commission for failing to provide regulatory clarity as it has demanded severally.
The second lawsuit which is obviously the most important is the charges on the trading platform for supporting the trading of unregistered crypto securities like Cardano (ADA), Solana (SOL), Filecoin (FIL) and Polygon (MATIC) amongst others.
The legal battle will be a long haul for the trading platform judging by the legal battle between Ripple Labs and the market regulators.
- FOMC Minutes Signal Fed Open to More Rate Cuts This Year, Bitcoin Bounces
- North Dakota To Issue ‘Roughrider’ Stablecoin Following Wyoming’s Footsteps
- Ethena Labs and Jupiter Partner to Launch JupUSD Stablecoin on Solana
- BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF Leads ETFs With $3.5B Weekly Inflows as It Eyes $100B in AUM
- MetaMask Launches Hyperliquid Perpetuals In-App, Plans To Integrate Polymarket
- Bitcoin Price Prediction as US Govt. Shutdown Extends- What’s Next for BTC?
- Solana Price Megaphone Points to a Parabolic Move as SOL Treasuries Near $3B
- XRP Price Prediction Amid ETF Approval Roadblock as Analyst Warns of $2.72 Dip
- Binance Coin Price Prediction If It Surpasses Bitcoin Marketcap— Is $3000 Possible in 2025?
- ASTER vs HYPE Price Analysis – Which Perp DEX Token Looks Poised to Dominate Q4 Performance?
- Ethereum Price Could Soar to $6,500 as BlackRock’s ETF Nears $20B Milestone