24/7 Cryptocurrency News

Consensys Responds to SEC Lawsuit Over MetaMask, Here’s All

Consensys defends against SEC lawsuit claiming MetaMask operated as unregistered broker, involving over $250M in fees.

Published by

Updated 20 May, 2025 | 07:56:49 AM UTC

Consensys Responds to SEC Lawsuit Over MetaMask, Here’s All

Highlights

Consensys disputes SEC's claim, asserting MetaMask is not a broker.
MetaMask accused of 36M unregistered crypto transactions.
Consensys seeks Texas court ruling on MetaMask's regulatory status.

Following the SEC lawsuit where Consensys is accused of operating as an unregistered broker through its MetaMask software, the firm has issued a response.

The SEC accused MetaMask of carrying out activities similar to securities brokerage without the appropriate registrations through its swap and staking services. Moreover, this legal action, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, follows a Wells notice Consensys received in April.

SEC’s Lawsuit Against Consensys

According to the SEC, Consensys, via MetaMask, facilitated over 36 million crypto asset transactions, including 5 million that involved crypto asset securities, without the required registration. These activities are said to have earned Consensys more than $250 million in transaction fees.

The SEC is specifically concerned about MetaMask’s Swaps and Staking services as these, in the view of the regulator, involve the sale of unregistered securities tokens, including CHZ, LUNA, MATIC, MANA, and SAND.

Besides directly facilitating transactions, MetaMask Swaps is alleged to act as an intermediary by searching for the best exchange rates and managing customers’ assets through smart contracts. The staking aspect of MetaMask, which involved collaborations with entities such as Lido and Rocket Pool, reportedly also involved the offer and sale of securities through staking programs that were also unregistered.

Consensys’s Defense and Legal Strategy

As a result of the SEC’s legal actions, Consensys has come out in support of their legal stance, claiming that the SEC cannot regulate software interfaces like MetaMask as brokers. The company has decided to go to court in Texas for this very matter, stressing that this case is not only vital for Consensys but for the entire web3 industry.

Consensys claims that what the SEC has done is to overstep its regulatory mandate and change the legal precedent that has been set. The company has taken the position that as a software interface it does not translate to being a securities broker hence clearing up the allegations.

The legal conflict with the SEC is taking place at the background of the growing pressure from the regulatory authorities on the cryptocurrency market. This lawsuit is similar to other high-profile cases such as the current case against Coinbase. Consensys has also previously sued the SEC in Texas claiming that MetaMask Swaps and Staking are not brokers as they are software tools, with reference to the case SEC v. Coinbase.

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin Munene is a crypto and finance journalist with over 5 years of experience, offering in-depth market analysis and expert commentary . With a Bachelor's degree in Journalism and Actuarial Science from Mount Kenya University, Kelvin is known for his meticulous research and strong writing skills, particularly in cryptocurrency, blockchain, and financial markets. His work has been featured across top industry publications such as Coingape, Cryptobasic, MetaNews, Cryptotimes, Coinedition, TheCoinrepublic, Cryptotale, and Analytics Insight among others, where he consistently provides timely updates and insightful content. Kelvin’s focus lies in uncovering emerging trends in the crypto space, delivering factual and data-driven analyses that help readers make informed decisions. His expertise extends across market cycles, technological innovations, and regulatory shifts that shape the crypto landscape. Beyond his professional achievements, Kelvin has a passion for chess, traveling, and exploring new adventures.

Published by

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Updated 20 May, 2025 | 07:56:49 AM

Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.

Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.