CFTC Contradicts SEC Over Prometheum’s Custody Of Ethereum As Security

Coingapestaff
March 7, 2024
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Ethereum News: Ex-CFTC Commissioner Calls SEC's Approach On Ethereum "Illegal"

Highlights

  • CFTC Chairman Behnam strongly opposed the possibile classification of Ethereum as a security.
  • CFTC and SEC are working closely to avert the compliance risks highlighted by Behnam.
  • Behnam also urged the Congress to intervene for better regulatory compliance.

The head of the commodities regulator has expressed contradiction with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over Prometheum’s Ethereum (ETH) claims. He warned that allowing one of its registered firms to custody Ethereum could create conflict within U.S. financial market regulations. According to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) chairman Rostin Behnam, both Bitcoin and Ethereum are commodities.

Advertisement
Advertisement

CFTC & SEC Clash On Prometheum’s Ethereum Custody Plans

CFTC Chairman Behnam testified before the House Committee on Agriculture on Wednesday, March 6. Moreover, he addressed the recent decision by SEC special purpose broker-dealer (SPBD) licensed Prometheum to offer ETH custody services. Countering the entity’s claims, he declared, “Both Bitcoin and Ether are commodities.”

While the CFTC and the SEC aren’t on the similar page, Behnam indicated that he doesn’t believe Prometheum’s decision aligns with the SEC’s view of Ethereum. He emphasized the critical nature of the SEC’s response to Prometheum’s decision. In the latest testimony, the CFTC Chairman noted, “The issue is if we do have any action by the SEC to essentially validate [Prometheum’s] decision, i.e. constituting Ether as a security, it will then put our registrants, our exchanges who list Ether as a futures contract sort of in non-compliance of SEC rules as opposed to CFTC rules.”

Regarding the regulatory ambiguity surrounding Ether, Behnam noted that SEC-registered SPBDs are only permitted to custody securities. However, SEC Chair Gary Gensler has not explicitly clarified whether Ethereum should be considered a security or a commodity.

Also Read: SEC Commissioners Criticize ShapeShift Settlement for Lack of Clarity

Advertisement
Advertisement

Behnam Urges Congress To Intervene

Additionally, Behnam stressed the importance of preserving “market integrity.” Moreover, he highlighted that considering Ethereum as a commodity has proven effective for market functionality over the years, hence, the request by Prometheum shouldn’t be accepted. In his prepared remarks, Behnam underscored the challenges posed by market evolution and technology, stressing the need for legislative action from Congress.

In addition, he pointed out that the increased participation in the crypto market has pushed the limits of the existing regulatory framework, particularly in addressing the regulatory gap over digital commodity asset spot markets. Behnam reiterated his belief that Congress must intervene to address these regulatory challenges effectively.

Also Read: Ripple CLO Weighs In On Flagged SEC’s “Loosey-Goosey” Rules

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.