Gold vs Bitcoin – Peter Schiff Declares BTC Has Failed as Digital Gold, CZ Reacts

Paul
3 hours ago
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Peter Schiff pictured beside Bitcoin and gold coins symbolizing digital gold debate.

Highlights

  • Peter Schiff says Bitcoin failed as digital gold amid 32% gold decline.
  • CZ highlights Bitcoin’s rise from $0.004 to $110,000, counters Schiff.
  • Analyst warns BTC may drop below $107K but sees accumulation near $100,000.

The debate on gold versus Bitcoin (BTC) has been renewed by Peter Schiff. He believed that Bitcoin cannot be regarded as digital gold yet and is not a valid alternative to the U.S. dollar. His remarks follow Bitcoin’s recent underperformance against gold, which he described as a “de-bitcoinization” phase.

Schiff Renews Gold Defense as CZ Highlights Bitcoin’s Long-Term Gains

According to Schiff, Bitcoin’s 32% decline since August when priced in gold signals that investors are losing faith in the asset’s long-term value. He called the current market phase a brutal bear cycle for Bitcoin holders.

Hence, Schiff urged them to sell their “fool’s gold” and move into real gold instead. Schiff added that Bitcoin’s failure to serve as a reliable store of value proves that gold remains the ultimate hedge against monetary instability. Recently, Schiff also warned that Bitcoin could be “rugged by gold,” reiterating his stance on gold’s superiority.

Binance founder Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, however, countered Schiff’s view, calling it “Peter revenge.” CZ noted that while Schiff may be correct in the short term, such moments represent only “about 1%” of Bitcoin’s 16-year history.

He said that Bitcoin’s performance over that period shows the biggest contrast with gold. It started at $0.004 and has since reached $110,000. CZ added that although gold might outperform Bitcoin in the short term, its edge is temporary. He said Bitcoin’s growing adoption and limited supply continue to support its value over the long-term.

Analyst Flags 200-Day MA as Key Support

Analyzing through a technical perspective, crypto market analyst Ted Pillows said Bitcoin’s immediate price action hinges on its 200-day moving average (MA) around $107,000. He warned that a daily close below that level could push BTC toward $100,000 or even lower, potentially to the $95,000–$90,000 range.

Ted explained that the 200-day MA does not always indicate a panic-selling point. Rather, it tends to serve as a powerful zone where long-term investors accumulate more of the coin.

According to his analysis, short-term pressure might be present, but the region around $100,000 will attract buying interest from investors whether institution or retail. The institutional confidence is exemplified by the recent BTC purchase by Michael Saylor-led Strategy.

Meanwhile, there is an increasing apprehension on the market. According to Polymarket data, traders have assigned a 43% chance that Bitcoin price would hit $130,000 in 2025, a drop of 21% from recent highs.

The decrease suggests that there is a reducing confidence in BTC recovery in the short term. However, the bias is not close to collapsing. On TradingView, Bitcoin trades near $108,392, down 2.18% in 24 hours and 12.18% for the week.

Polymarket chart shows 43% probability of Bitcoin reaching $130K in 2025.
Polymarket traders lower chances of BTC price hitting $130K in 2025.
Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
Paul Adedoyin is a crypto journalist with 4+ years experience who provides timely news, in-depth research, and insightful content to inform and empower his audience. His works have been featured on sites such as CryptoMode, CryptoNewsFlash among others. He holds a degree in Geophysics from OAU, Nigeria. When he's not writing, he loves watching soccer and reading educative journals. He can be reached via [email protected]
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.