Mt Gox Bitcoin Creditors Face Withdrawal Restriction On Bitstamp

Kritika Mehta
July 26, 2024 Updated July 27, 2024
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Mt Gox Bitcoin Creditors Face Withdrawal Restriction On Bitstamp

Highlights

  • Despite Bitstamp announcing disbursement of Mt. Gox repayments to creditors, some users have been complaining.
  • Some creditors highlighted that they are unable to withdraw their BTC holdings from Bitstamp.
  • The issue stems from a verification process, which requires a video call with the exchange's support team.

In a controversial development, Mt. Gox Bitcoin (BTC) creditors have previously faced hurdles in withdrawing their reclaimed assets from the Bitstamp crypto exchange. Several users have voiced their frustrations on the Mt. Gox insolvency subreddit. They alleged that Bitstamp is effectively holding their coins “hostage” by implementing an arduous withdrawal verification process.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bitstamp Restricts Mt. Gox Bitcoin Withdrawal

An original poster detailed their struggle, explaining that despite having their coins credited to their Bitstamp accounts, they were unable to withdraw them. The withdrawal requires users to complete a mandatory video call with customer support. The poster lamented that all available slots for the video calls were fully booked, causing further delays.

“My question is if I’m already verified with Bitstamp, what gives them the legal right to hold the coins hostage like this? Someone talk me down, please. I’m more than pissed about this,” the original poster wrote. In contrast, another member of the subreddit provided a different perspective, noting that Bitstamp has up to 90 days to distribute the funds contractually.

“They emailed us and said we’ll get the coins within a week and they posted the amounts to our account in a day. Let’s give it a few more days. A few extra security steps aren’t going to hurt after what we’ve gone through,” they remarked.

Another user echoed these sentiments, emphasizing that users had consented to a 90-day processing period when they agreed to Bitstamp’s terms. Moreover, they criticized the original poster’s impatience and urged them to consider the broader context of ensuring a smooth and secure distribution process.

“Clearly they chose this procedure to make sure the distribution process works and no glitch occurred/has been fixed. As soon as they verified, they just lift the freeze and you can spoil the money,” the user commented. Adding to the discussion, a user speculated that the original poster might have a substantial amount of Bitcoin, necessitating additional security measures by Bitstamp.

However, soon after, Bitstamp provided an update and said that the creditors could now have access to the assets. Bitstamp noted that “after completing security checks”, they have allowed access to the creditors on its platform.

Also Read: Senator Cynthia Lummis Confirms Big Announcement In Bitcoin Conference

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bitstamp Issues Official Response

Despite these explanations, another user expressed skepticism over the need for additional verification by Bitstamp, pointing out that other exchanges did not impose such requirements. “Nobody else seems to require this, very strange. I can understand why they didn’t mention this before people chose the exchange as nobody would have used them at all,” the user argued.

Contrasting Bitstamp’s approach, users praised Kraken for its prompt and smooth disbursement process. “No problems at all withdrawing both fiat and BTC, within hours of receiving the goxxcoins. Kraken is an amazing exchange,” a Kraken user shared.

Bitstamp has previously attempted to address these concerns on X (formerly Twitter), reassuring users that “the users don’t have to do anything.” The crypto exchange’s statement suggests that the delay is temporary and assures speedy resolution without further action required from the creditors. However, after a decade-long wait for Mt. Gox repayments, the frustration among some creditors is understandable.

Today, Bitstamp announced that it completed disbursement of the BTC and BCH assets to its users. Nonetheless, the “security checks” it mentions has irked users as the slots are fully booked as of yet. Hence, users now await a new schedule for slot booking.

Notably, Kraken, despite its recent praise, also faced backlash earlier in the week. Some users reported that Kraken had failed to disburse the Mt. Gox Bitcoin to certain creditors. In addition, it allegedly did not follow up with emails, leaving many without their expected repayments. Furthermore, some creditors claimed that they didn’t even receive the initial cash payments.

Also Read: Coinbase Sells User Bitcoin Holdings Due To Inactivity But There’s A Catch

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
Kritika boasts over 2 years of experience in the financial news sector. Currently working as a crypto journalist at Coingape, she has consistently shown a knack for blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. Kritika combines insightful analysis with a deep understanding of market trends. With a keen interest in technical analysis, she brings a nuanced perspective to her reporting, exploring the intersection of finance, technology, and emerging trends in the crypto space.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.