Ripple CTO Unveils Ripple Effect Of SEC’s Unconventional Appeal

Coingapestaff
August 19, 2023
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Ripple CTO David Schwartz Dismisses Lawsuit Against CharacterAI

In a recent Twitter post, Ripple Labs’ CTO David “JoelKatz” Schwartz, shed light on the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) request for an expedited appeal following a crucial ruling by Judge Analisa Torres on the status of Ripple’s XRP token. The legal maneuver has ignited a debate throughout the action in the ongoing legal battle.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Schwartz Explains The Effect Of SEC’s Appeal

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) made its appeal plea after Judge Torres’ decision that XRP is not a security, signaling a pivotal victory for Ripple. However, the appeal request centers on an unexpected twist in the proceedings.

According to the CTO, the SEC’s motion to appeal at this juncture stems from its understanding that the lawsuit has not concluded, hence granting parties the right to appeal after the case is finalized. This procedural approach, designed to streamline the legal process, prevents the constant interruption of the primary case with ongoing appeals for each minor ruling.

The CTO emphasized the necessity of consolidating appeals for efficiency, especially since individual appeals could potentially elongate the already time-consuming litigation. A typical appeal period takes a minimum of a year to conclude, and if multiple appeals arise during the ongoing case, the litigation could become cumbersome or even endless.

The CTO, on the other hand, explained that there is a provision for unusual instances. The SEC claims that the unusual circumstances of this case justify deviating from the norm. It advises that procedures be halted until the appeal is resolved, which Ripple opposes.

Also Read: Shiba Inu Lead Developer Promises Scaling Shibarium By 1500%

Advertisement
Advertisement

What Happens If SEC’s Appeal Is Granted?

The stance taken by Ripple, supported by its leadership, is that even if the SEC is allowed to appeal, the primary lawsuit should continue along with the appeal procedure. This position is in line with the idea of allowing the trial to continue while thoroughly considering any appeals when it is over.

The CTO’s clarification comes in reaction to rumors circulating in the Bitcoin community about the possibility that the SEC may appeal Judge Torres’ ruling to higher courts. This developing situation demonstrates the complexity of regulatory monitoring and the nuanced legal environment around digital assets.

The outcome of the legal dispute between Ripple Labs and the SEC will be significantly impacted by the court’s decision on whether to approve the appeal request. It has sparked a larger discussion regarding the relationships between appeals, ongoing cases, and the goal of efficient judicial processes.

Also Read: Crypto Price Today: Injective, HBAR Sees Bull Runs, RPL Price Continues Bears

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.