Ripple Exec Reveals Why USDC/XRP AMM Pool Keeps Getting Out Of Balance
Highlights
- Ripple alum Neil Hartner delved into the intricacies of the USDC/XRP AMM Pool imbalance.
- He noted that the pool is "interesting" owing to the phenomenon.
- He pointed out the single-sided deposits made during such an imbalance.
Neil Hartner, a former Senior Software Engineer at Ripple Labs, sheds light on the persistent imbalance plaguing the USDC/XRP Automated Market Maker (AMM) pool. In a recent discourse on the matter, Hartner delved into the technical intricacies behind the phenomenon. In addition, he also addressed user queries and elucidated the functionality of AMMs.
Ripple Alum Explains USDC/XRP AMM Pool Imbalance
Hartner remarked, “The USDC/XRP AMM pool is interesting because it keeps getting out of balance.” He attributed this imbalance to occasional delays in minting USDC, which results in most of the USDC being locked up in the pool. As a consequence, arbitrageurs encounter hurdles in rectifying the imbalance promptly.
The Ripple alum added, “And the reason it gets out of balance is people continue to make poor choices with single sided deposits into an already unbalanced pool.” Meanwhile, a user raised the question of the minimal deviation from balance. He suggested it might not be a poor choice for those uninterested in dealing with the spread, slippage, and fees associated with acquiring both assets and joining the AMM.
Hence, Hartner clarified that despite the seemingly minor discrepancy, the deviation between the AMM rate and the exchange rate indicated an imbalance in the pool. Furthermore, queries delved into the feasibility of depositing into the AMM function with a single asset.
Moreover, the Ripple exec explained that while possible through a DEX trade followed by a double-sided deposit, the process entails multiple transactions, posing usability challenges for the end-user.
Also Read: Ripple CTO Explains How Native Lending Protocol Will Expand XRPL Utility
How Do AMMs Work?
AMMs function as smart contracts facilitating liquidity provision in decentralized exchanges. These contracts maintain pools of two assets and enable users to swap between them based on predetermined exchange rates. Liquidity providers deposit assets into AMMs, receiving LP Tokens in return, which entitle them to a share of the pool’s assets and fee collection.
The imbalance in the USDC/XRP AMM pool underscores the intricate dynamics of AMMs. Despite the apparent convenience of single-sided deposits, the Ripple engineer emphasized the necessity of maintaining balance for efficient market operations. As such, understanding the mechanics of AMMs becomes paramount for participants in decentralized exchanges.
Also Read: Breaking: Germany’s Biggest Federal Bank Partners Bitpanda To Offer Crypto Custody
- Ethereum Staking Hits Record Highs as BitMine Continues to Stake ETH
- Crypto Bill News: U.S Senate Postpones Thursday’s Markup as Coinbase Pulls Support
- U.S. SEC Ends Zcash Foundation Probe as Dubai Tightens Rules on Privacy Tokens
- Sui Network Suffers Outage as Mainnet Stalls; SUI Price Flat
- Crypto ETF News: Bitwise Launches Chainlink ETF as Institutional Inflows Return
- Bitcoin Price Forecast: How the Supreme Court Tariff Decision Could Affect BTC Price
- Ethereum Price Prediction as Network Activity Hits ATH Ahead of CLARITY Markup
- Robinhood Stock Price Prediction: What’s Potential for HOOD in 2026??
- Cardano Price Prediction as Germany’s DZ Bank Gets MiCAR Approval for Cardano Trading
- Meme Coins Price Prediction: What’s Next for Pepe Coin, Dogecoin, and Shiba Inu Amid Market Rally?
- Standard Chartered Predicts Ethereum Price could reach $40,000 by 2030





