SEC Chair Gary Gensler Firmly Opposes FIT21 Act, Here’s All

Coingapestaff
May 22, 2024 Updated May 16, 2025
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
US SEC Chair Gary Gensler Says Crypto Still Needs Tougher Oversight

Highlights

  • SEC Chair Gary Gensler argues that the FIT21 Act would create significant regulatory gaps, undermining decades of financial oversight precedent.
  • Gensler warns that the act would hinder the SEC's ability to protect investors by allowing crypto firms to self-certify as decentralized, avoiding scrutiny.
  • He stressed that the act could potentially enable fraudulent schemes to bypass securities laws.

Gary Gensler, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair in a recent statement has expressed strong opposition to the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act, also known as the FIT21 Act. In the statement released Wednesday via key sources, Gensler articulated his concerns that the act would create significant regulatory gaps and undermine longstanding precedents regarding the oversight of investment contracts.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Gensler’s Strong Opposition & Risks Highlighted

Gary Gensler argued that this could put both investors and capital markets at substantial risk. “The FIT21 Act would create new regulatory gaps and undermine decades of precedent regarding the oversight of investment contracts, putting investors and capital markets at immeasurable risk,” Gensler said in his statement. A post on X by Alexander Grieve has revealed key details of his buttressed points.

His most stressed argument against the FIT21 Act centers on the classification of crypto assets as investment contracts. He believes that the act, known as H.R. 4763, would remove these assets from the SEC’s oversight, thereby hindering efforts to protect investors. Gensler highlighted that the act could enable crypto firms to self-certify their investments and products as “decentralized” and classify them under a special category of “digital commodities.”

This self-certification process would severely limit the SEC’s ability to challenge these classifications due to resource constraints. “The self-certification process risks investor protection not just in the crypto space; it could undermine the broader $100 trillion capital markets by providing a path for those trying to escape robust disclosures, prohibitions preventing the loss and theft of customer funds, enforcement by the SEC, and private rights of action for investors in the federal courts,” Gensler emphasized.

Also Read: BlackRock Bitcoin ETF Grabs Spotlight With $290M Inflow, Outshines Rivals

Advertisement
Advertisement

Concerns Over Market Regulation and Potential Fraud

Furthermore, Gensler voiced concerns that the FIT21 Act could potentially allow bad actors to exploit the regulatory gaps created by the bill. He warned that perpetrators of fraudulent schemes such as pump-and-dump and penny stock schemes might label their activities as crypto investment contracts or self-certify their systems as decentralized to evade securities laws.

“What if perpetrators of pump and dump schemes and penny stock pushers contend that they’re outside of the securities laws by labeling themselves as crypto investment contracts or self-certifying that they are decentralized systems?” Gensler questioned.

Additionally, he criticized the bill for excluding crypto trading platforms from the definition of an exchange and eliminating historically tested frameworks such as the Howey test, which he believes would further expose investors to risk.

Also Read: Former FTX Exec. Ryan Salame To Face 7 Yrs Sentencing, Here’s All

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.