SEC Chair Gary Gensler To Get More Letters On ETF Blunder Today

Coingapestaff
January 10, 2024
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
US SEC Chair Gary Gensler To Propose Crypto Regulations Amid Resignation Calls

On Tuesday, January 9, U.S. Senators, JD Vance and Thom Thrills sent a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) demanding an answer to the recent X account hack and Bitcoin ETF approval farce. In addition, according to Fox Journalist, Eleanor Terrett, more congressional letters are set to hit SEC Chairman Gary Gensler’s inbox.

Also Read: VanEck Advisor Labels SEC’s Fake Bitcoin ETF Approval Post As ‘Inside Job’

Advertisement
Advertisement

Senators’ Stance On Recent Bitcoin ETF Controversy

In a joint letter addressed to Gary Gensler, the Senators expressed deep concern over the agency’s social media communication regarding the errant approval of Spot Bitcoin ETFs. They highlighted a critical timeline where the SEC’s official X account initially announced approval, causing a surge in Bitcoin’s value. However, they later clarified the announcement as unauthorized, citing that their social media account was hacked.

Moreover, the letter emphasizes the potential impact on investors and questions the SEC’s internal cybersecurity procedures. Senators are demanding clarity, urging the SEC to address the nature of the breach, provide details on the investigation, and explain plans to rectify financial losses for affected investors. The SEC is urged to respond to the inquiries by January 23, 2024, as Vance and Thrills call for transparency amid this significant regulatory mishap.

In addition, the letter questioned the regulatory body if any employee was behind the account breach or if a third party was to be blamed. Furthermore, the Senators deemed the false Spot Bitcoin ETF approval post as a “colossal error” on the SEC’s part. In the letter, they stated, “It is unacceptable that the agency entrusted with regulating the epicenter of the world’s capital markets would make such a colossal error.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

SEC Receives Massive Backlash

After the SEC’s X account was compromised and the fake ETF approval post sent shockwaves through the industry, U.S. regulatory agency attracted criticism. In a recent post on X, Rep. Bill Huizenga heavily criticized Gary Gensler. Quoting the SEC Chair’s tweet, Huizenga wrote, “Does this mean we can blame more of the @secgov’s horrible rulemaking and so-called regulation by enforcement on a ‘compromised account’?”

Recently, Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas held SEC responsible for the event. According to a post on X by Balchunas, it was a result of a “scheduled tweet gone bad.” In addition, Anthony Scaramucci, the Former White House Communications Director, disputed SEC Chair Gensler’s claim that the agency’s X account was compromised. Scaramucci asserted that a SEC staff member prematurely shared the news. He perceives it as the “amateurish and dishonest nature of the current SEC leadership regime.”

Also Read: US SEC Faces Massive Backlash Over Fake Spot Bitcoin ETF ‘Approval’ Post

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.