SEC Chair Gensler Leads Push for Stricter Rules on SPACs

SEC Chair Gensler tightens SPAC rules with 3-2 vote, boosting disclosure requirements for earnings and investor protections.
SEC's Mute Stance on Ether Classification was Misleading, Says Patrick McHenry

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has recently implemented a series of stringent regulations aimed at “special-purpose acquisition companies” (SPACs). These new rules, adopted with a 3-2 vote by the SEC Commission, significantly increase legal responsibilities for SPACs, particularly concerning the disclosure of projected earnings and other vital information.

Advertisement
Advertisement

SPACs Under Scrutiny

SPACs, often described as blank-check companies, are designed to raise capital through listings for the sole purpose of acquiring a private entity, thereby taking it public. This approach has been criticized for allowing companies to bypass the rigorous regulatory requirements typical of traditional initial public offerings (IPOs).

The SEC’s heightened interest in SPACs follows a surge in such transactions during 2020 and 2021, which raised concerns over exaggerated or misleading financial projections from target companies.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Enhanced Investor Protections

SEC Chair Gary Gensler emphasized the necessity of aligning SPAC operations with the regulatory framework of traditional IPOs. Consequently, the new regulations necessitate more stringent disclosures about SPAC sponsors’ compensation, potential conflicts of interest, and the likelihood of share value dilution.

Additionally, in certain cases, target companies must now register with the SEC, accepting responsibility for investor disclosures related to the deal.

While Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, a vocal advocate for financial reform, commended the SEC’s action, some Republican Commission members expressed concerns. They suggested that the new rules might unduly hinder the use of SPACs as a valuable investment mechanism.

Advertisement
Advertisement

SEC Adapting to Public Feedback

The SEC altered its initial proposal in response to public input. Notably, it removed the suggested 18-to-24-month timeframe for SPACs to finalize mergers or forfeit certain legal protections. It also abandoned the idea of automatically classifying some SPAC IPO participants as underwriters in subsequent mergers.

The regulations will be effective 125 days following their publication in the federal register. SPACs currently listed will remain governed by prior regulations if they complete their acquisition within this 125-day transitional period. The enactment of these rules comes at a time when investor enthusiasm for SPAC deals has significantly diminished.

Read Also: Adam Back Addresses Mt. Gox Repayment Fears Amid Bitcoin Market Volatility

Advertisement
Kelvin Munene Murithi
Kelvin Munene is a crypto and finance journalist with over 5 years of experience, offering in-depth market analysis and expert commentary . With a Bachelor's degree in Journalism and Actuarial Science from Mount Kenya University, Kelvin is known for his meticulous research and strong writing skills, particularly in cryptocurrency, blockchain, and financial markets. His work has been featured across top industry publications such as Coingape, Cryptobasic, MetaNews, Cryptotimes, Coinedition, TheCoinrepublic, Cryptotale, and Analytics Insight among others, where he consistently provides timely updates and insightful content. Kelvin’s focus lies in uncovering emerging trends in the crypto space, delivering factual and data-driven analyses that help readers make informed decisions. His expertise extends across market cycles, technological innovations, and regulatory shifts that shape the crypto landscape. Beyond his professional achievements, Kelvin has a passion for chess, traveling, and exploring new adventures.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.