Terra Classic Community Alleges 200 Million USTC Theft By Andalusia Labs

The DeFi ecosystem is shaken as allegations of token theft surface against Karak and Andalusia Labs. Accusations of misappropriating 200 million USTC tokens spark a contentious dispute.
By Coingape Staff
Updated September 5, 2025
Terra Classic Price

Highlights

  • Allegations of misappropriating 200 million USTC tokens cast a shadow over DeFi protocol Karak and its creator, Andalusia Labs.
  • Karak vehemently denies involvement, labeling accusations as fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD), while Andalusia Labs asserts ownership of the tokens.
  • The controversy underscores broader concerns about transparency and accountability in the DeFi ecosystem, as market sentiment wavers amidst the unfolding saga.

The emergence of Karak, a novel DeFi protocol, was anticipated to inject dynamism into the crypto sphere. However, the euphoria surrounding its launch has been overshadowed by allegations of impropriety. Accusations have surfaced from members of the Terra Classic community, casting a shadow over Andalusia Labs, the entity responsible for Karak. These accusations assert that Andalusia Labs orchestrated the misappropriation of a staggering 200 million USTC tokens, valued at approximately $7 million.

In response, Karak has vehemently denied any complicity in the purported misappropriation, dismissing the claims as unfounded FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt). Conversely, Andalusia Labs has adamantly asserted ownership of the tokens, contending that they were rightfully granted for the explicit purpose of insuring Karak’s restaking pools. This contentious debacle has not only raised serious questions about the integrity of Andalusia Labs but has also cast doubt on Karak’s credibility within the DeFi ecosystem.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Background and Timeline of Events

The genesis of the controversy can be traced back to the allocation of 200 million USTC tokens from the Terra community pool to Ozone, a decentralized insurance protocol under the stewardship of Risk Harbor. The collapse of Terra in May 2022 precipitated a seismic shift in the crypto landscape, prompting the transfer of blockchain stewardship to the Terra Classic community and the rebranding of the Terra stablecoin as TerraUSD Classic (USTC).

A meticulous timeline reveals the convoluted trajectory of the 200 million USTC tokens, beginning with their transfer to Risk Harbor’s wallet and culminating in subsequent transactions to enigmatic accounts on prominent exchanges. Moreover, anomalies surfaced during the audit of the UST underwriting contract, coinciding with the unceremonious removal of critical details from the original proposal.

Also Read: Solana Meme Coin Dogwifhat (WIF) Hits $41 On Bybit After Spot Listing

Advertisement
Advertisement

Community Response and Price Analysis

The response from the Terra Classic community has been swift and resolute, as efforts to reclaim the misappropriated funds have yielded partial success. Despite this, Karak’s steadfast refusal to entertain governance proposals seeking the restitution of the remaining funds has incited considerable discontent among community members.

The ensuing discord has underscored a broader issue of accountability and transparency within the DeFi space, prompting impassioned calls from crypto privacy advocates for increased scrutiny and oversight. Concurrently, amidst the maelstrom of controversy, the LUNC price fell 5.14% in the last 24 hours amid market-wide selloff, with the price currently trading at $0.0001022. The 24-hour low and high are $0.0001067 and $0.0001008, respectively. Moreover, trading volume decreased slightly in the last 24 hours, indicating a decline in interest among traders.

Also Read: Bitcoin and Ethereum Lead Three Weeks of Crypto Investment Outflows, What’s Next?

Advertisement
Coingape Staff
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.