Breaking: US SEC Files Coinbase Insider Case as Supplemental Authority in Binance Suit
Highlights
- U.S. SEC files to leverage the Coinbase insider trading case win in the Binance lawsuit
- SEC argues crypto assets bought in secondary market are securities under the Howey test
- SEC files a similar supplemental authority to double up its win in the Wahi case to lawsuit against Coinbase
In a significant development in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lawsuit against Binance, Binance.US and ex-CEO Changpeng Zhao, the securities regulator is leveraging the Coinbase insider trading case in the Binance lawsuit.
SEC Files Supplemental Authority in Binance Case
According to a court filing late March 4, the plaintiff SEC submitted a notice of supplemental authority to consider default judgment in SEC v. Wahi in the ongoing lawsuit against Binance Holdings.
Coinbase insider trading case involved Coinbase’s former product manager Ishan Wahi, his brother Nikhil Wahi, and their friend Sameer Ramani. In a default judgment, Judge Tana Lin ruled that the trading of certain crypto assets on a secondary market are securities.
The SEC argued that crypto assets purchased on trading platforms are securities because the assets were offered and sold as investment contracts under the Howey test. The SEC also cited Judge Rakoff ruling in the SEC lawsuit against Terraform Labs and Do Kwon, where the LUNA and MIR tokens were classified as securities.
SEC lawyers claim this is relevant for denying Binance, Binance.US, and CZ’s motions to dismiss the lawsuit. The securities regulator is apparently seeking to validate secondary crypto sales as an argument to gain upper hand in the ongoing lawsuits against crypto exchanges.
Also Read: Bitcoin (BTC) Price Nears All-Time High At $68,600, Further Rally Expected?
Just before filing in the Binance suit, the SEC submitted a similar supplemental authority to double up its win in the Wahi case to lawsuit against crypto exchange Coinbase. It is consistent with the SEC’s perspective that certain crypto transactions should be treated as securities transactions and are thereby subject to its regulation.
However, Coinbase CLO Paul Grewal has denied already that default judgment in Wahi lawsuit is not a valid precedent for other lawsuits or claiming jurisdiction over the crypto industry. He argued that default judgments aren’t contested, as they occur when the defendant fails to appear in court to contest the allegations.
Also Read: Fidelity Bitcoin ETF Clocks Record Inflows Above $400 Million, Trading Volumes SkyRocket
- Is Michael Saylor’s Strategy Bitcoin Portfolio in the Red as BTC Crashes?
- Arthur Hayes Predicts Bitcoin Rally To $200k By Year-End Despite Liquidity-Driven Bear Market
- WhiteBIT Launches a New Listing Support Program With Integrated Marketing and Liquidity Tools
- Democrats Demand Probe Into Trump-Linked WLFI Over Token Sales To Illicit Actors
- El Salvador Makes Its Largest Bitcoin Purchase Ever Despite Rising Market Sell-Off
- Is Dogecoin Price Set for a Recovery as Grayscale ETF Speculation Intensifies?
- Will MOODENG Reach $0.1 and MEW Hit $0.002 After Robinhood Listing?
- What’s Next for Cardano Price After Breaking Below Key Support Level?
- Pi Coin Price Could Jump 30%, But There’s a Catch
- Expert Sees XRP Price Rally if it Holds Key Support Ahead of Ripple ETF Launch
- Chainlink Price Eyes Breakout as Whales Scoop 150K $LINK





