XRP Lawsuit: Lawyer Says Judge Torres’ Settlement Approval Still Up in the Air

Despite both Ripple and the SEC's agreement, the XRP lawsuit settlement is still hanging in Judge Torres' decision, says lawyer.
By Nynu V Jamal
Breaking: Judge Torres Denies Ripple SEC Motion In XRP Lawsuit

Highlights

  • Bill Morgan sheds light on the uncertainty surrounding the XRP lawsuit settlement.
  • Though Ripple and SEC agreed for a settlement, Judge Torres' approval is still uncertain.
  • Considering the public interest, it is likely that Judge Torres will make a positive decision.

The high-profile XRP lawsuit has reached a pivotal juncture as both Ripple and the US SEC have filed a settlement letter. However, XRP lawyer Bill Morgan asserts that the Ripple lawsuit’s settlement approval is still contingent on Judge Torres’ indicative ruling.

Further elaborating on the Ripple vs SEC case, Bill Morgan highlighted the additional steps required to finalize the settlement amidst ongoing uncertainty. Let’s break down the XRP lawyer’s X thread and analyse the potential developments within the suit.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Lawyer Explains Why the XRP Lawsuit Settlement Is Not a Done Deal

In a recent X post, XRP lawyer Bill Morgan shared insights on the uncertainty surrounding the Ripple case settlement. Though both parties have agreed to a settlement, Morgan states that Judge Analisa Torres’ approval still hangs in uncertainty.

However, Morgan believes Judge Torres’ approval becomes more plausible, considering public interest. He stated,

There is no certainty that judge Torres will grant the relief the parties seek pursuant to the settlement agreement. She must form a view that it is in the public interest.

Further elaborating his points, Morgan stated that the overwhelming support from XRP holders could influence Judge Torres’ decision in favor of the settlement terms. Referring to pro-XRP lawyer John Deaton and the 80,000 followers in the Ripple lawsuit, Morgan commented that the judge is likely to consider dissolving the injunction and reducing the fine to $50 million.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Settlement Process Breakdown

As highlighted by Morgan, the XRP lawsuit settlement process involves several key steps. The initial and major step involved both parties’ settlement requests. While Ripple filed for a settlement on April 23, the SEC submitted the letter on May 8. The parties have also filed motions to pause the ongoing appeal and cross-appeal. On May 8, they filed a Rule 62.1 motion seeking an indicative ruling from Judge Torres.

If Judge Torres grants the indicative ruling, the parties will then file a motion for a limited remand with the Court of Appeals to seek the agreed-upon relief. After obtaining the remand, they’ll file a motion with Judge Torres to implement the XRP lawsuit settlement terms. Once the fine is paid and the injunction is dissolved, the final step will be for both parties to file a motion to dismiss the appeal and cross-appeal with the Second Circuit Court.

Advertisement
Nynu V Jamal
Nynu V Jamal is a Senior Journalist at CoinGape. She boasts more than 3 years of experience in content writing, with expertise in crypto and blockchain. She has contributed to platforms like CoinEdition and CryptoTale, demonstrating her proficiency in navigating the dynamic crypto landscape. Beyond her journalistic pursuits, Nynu is a literary enthusiast, having served as an Assistant Professor of English Language and Literature. She is a Master's degree holder in English Literature and a UGC NET qualifier. Her academic background has enabled her to publish research papers on literature, while also nurturing her creative side as a published poet. Her creative side extends to music, crafts, and art, which she actively explores. Her unique blend of analytical and creative skills allows her to craft engaging stories that captivate audiences. Stay updated with Nynu on LinkedIn
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.