XRP Lawsuit: Lawyers Claim Ripple Case Is In SEC Favor, Chevron Ruling Irrelevant

Varinder Singh
July 3, 2024 Updated April 25, 2025
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
XRP Lawyer Weaponizes X Community Notes Against SEC Crypto Scam Alert

Highlights

  • Former SEC lawyers said the remedies phase is in the US SEC's favor.
  • Supreme Court's ruling on Chevron deference has no implications for SEC enforcement actions.
  • $770 million in XRP sales to institutions violated the securities laws.
  • XRP price dropped in the past 24 hours.

XRP Lawsuit: As Ripple fights to strengthen its argument that injunction and penalties must be light in the case, former U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lawyers argue the remedies phase is in the SEC’s favor. The lawyers also cleared the air about the implications of the Chevron ruling by the Supreme Court in SEC vs Ripple and other lawsuits.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Former SEC Lawyers Says Chevron Deference Has No Impact

Retired SEC securities lawyer Marc Fagel in a post on X said that the Supreme Court’s ruling on Chevron deference applies to the rulemaking by government agencies and not implications for SEC enforcement actions. The courts would defer to an agency in case there is an unclear statute.

“Courts determine for themselves whether the defendant broke the law and give no deference to the SEC,” added Fagel. He further cleared that it’s the reason why Judge Torres issued a mixed summary judgment ruling as she did not defer to the SEC. Therefore, the overturn of Chevron deference has no implications in the XRP lawsuit.

Ex-SEC lawyer James Farrell claims the SEC has an upper hand in the remedies phase as Judge Torres knows about $770 million in XRP sales violated the securities laws. The tussle is over what percentage of these sales Ripple has to pay the SEC, additional penalty, and if Ripple still violating the law.

Also Read: Ripple and Coinbase Use Binance Win to Contest SEC Claims

Advertisement
Advertisement

Binance’s Partial Win Relevant In Ripple Lawsuit?

As CoinGape reported, Judge Torres’ decision on XRP security status that programmatic sales and secondary sales are similar is followed by Judge Jackson in SEC vs Binance. She dismissed the US SEC’s claim on Binance’s BNB secondary sales and cleared that secondary sales do not qualify as securities under the Howey Test.

Coinbase and Ripple Labs filed Binance’s partial legal victory to challenge the lack of crypto regulatory clarity and consistency.

Attorney Jeremy Hogan said the filing is relevant regarding possible injunction and the fine. He believes Binance opinion has reinforced Ripple’s argument that the status of crypto as a “security” is a cluster and therefore the “injunction and fine should both be light.”

XRP price fell 1% in the past 24 hours, with the price currently trading at $0.48. The 24-hour low and high are $0.478 and $0.487, respectively. Furthermore, the trading volume has increased by 16% in the last 24 hours, indicating a rise in pull among traders.

Also Read: CoinDCX Acquires BitOasis To Foray Into MENA Region

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
Varinder has over 10 years of experience and is known as a seasoned leader for his involvement in the fintech sector. With over 5 years dedicated to blockchain, crypto, and Web3 developments, he has experienced two Bitcoin halving events making him key opinion leader in the space. At CoinGape Media, Varinder leads the editorial decisions, spearheading the news team to cover latest updates, markets trends and developments within the crypto industry. The company was recognized as Best Crypto Media Company 2024 for high impact and quality reporting. Being a Master of Technology degree holder, analytics thinker, technology enthusiast, Varinder has shared his knowledge of disruptive technologies in over 5000+ news, articles, and papers.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.