XRP Lawyer John Deaton Slams SEC’s Gary Gensler For ‘Infecting’ Entire Agency

Amid the Consensys lawsuit, pro-XRP lawyer John Deaton issued a stern reply against the SEC Chair Gary Gensler and accused him of 'infecting' the entire agency.
By Coingape Staff
Pro XRP Lawyer John Deaton Warns Users Against Crypto Scams

Highlights

  • The SEC is accused of contradicting its stance on the classification of Ethereum.
  • John Deaton also joined the fray and held Chairman Gary Gensler responsible for the mishap.
  • The XRP attorney also highlighted the need for subpoena against the SEC.

In a scathing rebuke of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Chairman Gary Gensler, prominent XRP advocate and lawyer John Deaton has launched a blistering attack. He accused Gensler of perpetuating bad faith regulation and ‘infecting’ the entire agency.

Advertisement
Advertisement

XRP Lawyer John Deaton Bashes SEC Chair Gary Gensler

Deaton took to social media platforms X to express his frustration. He stated, “With all due respect, it’s time to serve multiple subpoenas on Gary Gensler and the SEC.” In addition, he referenced his amicus brief in the Coinbase vs SEC case to help understand the picture.

He added, “I encourage everyone to read the Amicus Brief I filed in the Coinbase case. There’s a section in the brief proving Gensler is a bad faith regulator who has infected the entire agency.” This condemnation comes in the wake of House Financial Services Committee Chairman Patrick McHenry’s statement regarding the ongoing legal battle between Consensys and the SEC.

McHenry minced no words and asserted, “Just months after a federal judge sanctioned SEC enforcement lawyers for lying to the court, new evidence shows Chair Gensler himself misled Congress.” Moreover, McHenry highlighted Gensler’s testimony to the Financial Services Committee last April, where he refused to address inquiries regarding the SEC’s classification of Ethereum.

The HFSC Chairman alleged that Gensler’s silence was a deliberate attempt to misrepresent the Commission’s stance. He emphasized, “Classifying Ether as a security contradicts previous statements of the SEC and Chair Gensler — yet another example of the arbitrary and capricious nature of the agency’s regulation by enforcement approach to digital assets.”

The Consensys lawsuit, at its core, demands the SEC to officially acknowledge that Ethereum is not a security. However, the SEC’s prior stance makes the situation complicated as the regulatory agency might end up contradicting its own statement.

Also Read: XRP Price Prediction: Is May A Good Time To Buy XRP?

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bill Morgan Offers Differing Take On Gensler Misleading Congress

Another XRP lawyer, Bill Morgan, responded to recent claims regarding Ethereum’s classification by the SEC. Morgan clarified, “This is not even accurate. The SEC is not classifying ETH as a security.” He emphasized the distinction, highlighting that the SEC is investigating whether offers or sales of Ethereum qualify as securities.

Referring to Judge Torres’ ruling in SEC vs Ripple, Morgan stressed, “A token itself is not a security but offers or sales of it in all the circumstances may be an investment contract.” His statement rebuts assertions made by Patrick McHenry and the Financial Services GOP, underscoring the need for clarity in regulatory matters.

The Financial Services GOP’s statement read, “Classifying #ETH as a security contradicts previous statements of the SEC and Chair Gensler. Republicans will continue to hold the SEC accountable for its regulatory overreach that is stifling innovation, leaving consumers unprotected, and risking our national security.”

Also Read: ETH Futures ETF Issuers Stay Positive on SEC Approval Despite Feud

Advertisement
Coingape Staff
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.