US SEC Might Face Jury Over Ripple’s Fair Notice Defence

Attorney John Deaton, Amicus curiae in the Ripple Vs SEC lawsuit stated that FND is pled as Ripple’s Fourth Affirmative Defense.
By Ashish Kumar
Updated May 16, 2025
Ripple XRP Case Update: Lawyer Dismisses SEC Meeting And Settlement Link

XRP News: The crucial legal battle between Ripple Labs and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is moving towards the much anticipated summary Judgment. It is expected that a verdict in the XRP lawsuit will provide regulatory clarity to the crypto industry, however, it can see a slight in the process.

Also Read: Ripple’s Fight Over Fair Notice With US SEC Extends

Advertisement
Advertisement

US SEC Giving Irrelevant Arguments

Defendants Ripple Labs, Brad Garlinghouse and Chris Larsen filed their reply to the commission’s letter of Supplemental Authority. The US SEC in order to secure Summary Judgment in the XRP lawsuit mentioned a court opinion from the SEC vs Commonwealth Equity Servs. However, Ripple slammed the US watchdog stating that it is an out-of-circuit, unpublished district court opinion.

The US SEC is trying to ditch and defend the Fair Notice argument raised by the Ripples and defendants. The Commonwealth case depicts that the defendants cited that there is no prima facie case evidence that can support its defense. Read XRP News Here…

Also Read: XRP Leading Top Altcoins Rally

Attorney John Deaton, Amicus curiae in the XRP lawsuit stated that the Fair Notice Defense (FND) is pled as Ripple’s Fourth Affirmative Defense. He added that Ripple’s FND argument is different as it is specific to XRP. The defendants’ argument states specific facts of how the U.S SEC and other agencies treated XRP.

He claimed that the defendants’ Fair Notice Defense is strong. There is a real chance that Judge Analisa Torres rules the FND to be decided by Jury. However, it is only possible when she finds that any XRP sales violated the law.

It is suggested that Judge Torres might not consider FND until she rules that Ripple offered/sold XRP as a security. However, if she decides that Ripple didn’t offer/or sale XRP as security at any time then Defendants wins outright.

Advertisement
Ashish Kumar
Ashish believes in Decentralisation and has a keen interest in evolving Blockchain technology, Cryptocurrency ecosystem, and NFTs. He aims to create awareness around the growing Crypto industry through his writings and analysis. When he is not writing, he is playing video games, watching some thriller movie, or is out for some outdoor sports. Reach me at [email protected]
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.