Sign Up on MEXC
Highlights
- Judge Torres' final judgment in the remedies phase likely to come in 2024 Q3.
- The FIT21 crypto bill will have huge impact on Ripple lawsuit, as well Binance and Coinbase lawsuits.
- The SEC can win permanent injunction against Ripple's XRP ODL transactions.
- XRP price will continue to move in range-bound.
XRP SEC Lawsuit: The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple Labs have presented their arguments in the remedies phase. The disputes related to sealing some details about Ripple’s financial results and post-complaint XRP sales to institutional investors.
The plaintiff, defendant, and third parties waiting for Judge Torres’ final judgment in the remedies phase, likely after the decision on the motion to seal. XRP lawsuit experts believe the judgment could come much earlier, most likely in 2024 Q3.
Ripple Vs SEC Lawsuit And Crypto Bill
The U.S. House of Representatives voted on the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21), the first step towards a regulatory framework for trading and issuance of digital assets. It will provide clarity on the crypto market structure and define jurisdictions of the CFTC and SEC to regulate the crypto industry in the United States.
If the crypto bill becomes law, it will impact Coinbase, Binance, and other lawsuits. This crypto law could also have some impact on the XRP lawsuit as congresspeople affirmed that July 2023 Judge Torres’ summary judgment did have a significant impact on the design of the crypto bill.
Interestingly, a section in the crypto bill is similar to what Judge Torres ruled that XRP is not itself a security. The bill crypto excludes claims that an investment contract asset is a security. “A digital asset sold or transferred or intended to be sold or transferred pursuant to an investment contract is not and does not become a security as a result of being sold or otherwise transferred pursuant to that investment contract,” it reads.
In response to a buzz that XRP would not be considered decentralized, lawyer Bill Morgan said “The legislation is not retrospective.” The court has already found XRP in itself is not a security. Also, the SEC had made it clear that they are not going to challenge the judgment. “The legislation will not change that,” he added.
Also Read: XRP Lawyer Spotlights Judge Torres ‘Influence’ On FIT21
Ripple Ready for Judge Torres’ Judgment
As reported by CoinGape, the US SEC opposed Ripple’s motion to seal evidence from the public. The SEC claimed that Ripple’s redaction requests would hide public information key to the court’s decisions in the remedies phase and understanding of the public to penalties amount. The details include amount of Ripple’s current assets (relevant to penalty amount), amount of recent sales (injunctive relief and penalties), revenues & expenses (disgorgement), and the size of discounts to some institutional investors (investor harm).
Meanwhile, the SEC seeks $2 billion in total fines and a final judgment, while Ripple asserts the company is only liable to pay civil penalties of not exceeding $10 million. Notably, courts have never accepted the amount first requested by a party, and the actual amount would be much lower.
That is correct. I think that Ripple’s current ODL sales arrangements assume a permanent injunction may be granted. A plan for the worst scenario. That arrangement which does not use XRP in US ODL transactions would probably also work around FIT21 if it is passed.
— bill morgan (@Belisarius2020) May 23, 2024
Bill Morgan believes Ripple will largely lose the motion to seal. He further added that the SEC clarified that none of the sales to institutions with discounts were ODL contracts, but the agency still seeks a permanent injunction to stop ODL sales.
The judge can grant a permanent injunction based on the current situation as the U.S. ODL transactions don’t use XRP, which might also work around the FIT21 if the law is passed. It’s worth noting that the FIT21 crypto bill gained significant favor in U.S. House voting. The bill mandates that digital assets sold under an investment contract do not necessarily classify the asset as a security just because it is transferred within a part of that contract.
Also Read: Bitcoin Price Hits $69,000; Will It Break $75,000 Soon?
- September 50 BPS Fed Rate Cut Odds Climb Ahead of CPI, PPI Data
- Michael Saylor Spotlights Strategy’s Performance Following S&P 500 Snub
- Donald Trump Shortlists Hassett, Warsh, and Waller for Fed Chair
- Ethena Labs Secures Fresh Funding From ArkStream Capital, ENA Price Spikes
- SEC Forms International Task Force to Crack Down on Pump-and-Dump Schemes
- Solana Price Prediction: Will Solana Hit $320 as SOL Strategies Gains Nasdaq Approval?
- XRP Price Forecast: Analyst Eyes $127 as BlackRock Joins Ripple Swell 2025
- Chainlink Price Eyes $55 as Reserve Holdings Jump With 43,937 LINK Addition
- Cardano Price Targets 30% Surge as Top Economist Calls for Fed Cut
- ETH Price Forecast as Grayscale’s Covered Call Ethereum ETF Spurs Optimism — Is $8,500 in Sight?
