XRP SEC Lawsuit Update: Is Ripple Prepared For Torres Decision in Remedies Phase?

Highlights
- Judge Torres' final judgment in the remedies phase likely to come in 2024 Q3.
- The FIT21 crypto bill will have huge impact on Ripple lawsuit, as well Binance and Coinbase lawsuits.
- The SEC can win permanent injunction against Ripple's XRP ODL transactions.
- XRP price will continue to move in range-bound.
XRP SEC Lawsuit: The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple Labs have presented their arguments in the remedies phase. The disputes related to sealing some details about Ripple’s financial results and post-complaint XRP sales to institutional investors.
The plaintiff, defendant, and third parties waiting for Judge Torres’ final judgment in the remedies phase, likely after the decision on the motion to seal. XRP lawsuit experts believe the judgment could come much earlier, most likely in 2024 Q3.
Ripple Vs SEC Lawsuit And Crypto Bill
The U.S. House of Representatives voted on the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21), the first step towards a regulatory framework for trading and issuance of digital assets. It will provide clarity on the crypto market structure and define jurisdictions of the CFTC and SEC to regulate the crypto industry in the United States.
If the crypto bill becomes law, it will impact Coinbase, Binance, and other lawsuits. This crypto law could also have some impact on the XRP lawsuit as congresspeople affirmed that July 2023 Judge Torres’ summary judgment did have a significant impact on the design of the crypto bill.
Interestingly, a section in the crypto bill is similar to what Judge Torres ruled that XRP is not itself a security. The bill crypto excludes claims that an investment contract asset is a security. “A digital asset sold or transferred or intended to be sold or transferred pursuant to an investment contract is not and does not become a security as a result of being sold or otherwise transferred pursuant to that investment contract,” it reads.
In response to a buzz that XRP would not be considered decentralized, lawyer Bill Morgan said “The legislation is not retrospective.” The court has already found XRP in itself is not a security. Also, the SEC had made it clear that they are not going to challenge the judgment. “The legislation will not change that,” he added.
Also Read: XRP Lawyer Spotlights Judge Torres ‘Influence’ On FIT21
Ripple Ready for Judge Torres’ Judgment
As reported by CoinGape, the US SEC opposed Ripple’s motion to seal evidence from the public. The SEC claimed that Ripple’s redaction requests would hide public information key to the court’s decisions in the remedies phase and understanding of the public to penalties amount. The details include amount of Ripple’s current assets (relevant to penalty amount), amount of recent sales (injunctive relief and penalties), revenues & expenses (disgorgement), and the size of discounts to some institutional investors (investor harm).
Meanwhile, the SEC seeks $2 billion in total fines and a final judgment, while Ripple asserts the company is only liable to pay civil penalties of not exceeding $10 million. Notably, courts have never accepted the amount first requested by a party, and the actual amount would be much lower.
That is correct. I think that Ripple’s current ODL sales arrangements assume a permanent injunction may be granted. A plan for the worst scenario. That arrangement which does not use XRP in US ODL transactions would probably also work around FIT21 if it is passed.
— bill morgan (@Belisarius2020) May 23, 2024
Bill Morgan believes Ripple will largely lose the motion to seal. He further added that the SEC clarified that none of the sales to institutions with discounts were ODL contracts, but the agency still seeks a permanent injunction to stop ODL sales.
The judge can grant a permanent injunction based on the current situation as the U.S. ODL transactions don’t use XRP, which might also work around the FIT21 if the law is passed. It’s worth noting that the FIT21 crypto bill gained significant favor in U.S. House voting. The bill mandates that digital assets sold under an investment contract do not necessarily classify the asset as a security just because it is transferred within a part of that contract.
Also Read: Bitcoin Price Hits $69,000; Will It Break $75,000 Soon?
- Is Trump Family, Mr. Beast Buying ASTER Token? Rumors Gain Strength
- Solana ETF Update: Grayscale, Fidelity, Others Files S-1 With Staking, Approval Expected in Two Weeks
- Cyber Hornet Seeks SEC Nod for S&P 500 and XRP ETF
- Cathie Wood’s Ark Invest Eyes Stake in Tether as USDT Issuer Targets $500B Valuation
- Kraken Secures $500M at $15B Valuation, Eyes IPO in 2026
- Solana Price Set for Q4 Surge as Canary Capital ETF Filing Meets Wyckoff Accumulation
- Avalanche Price Could Surge to $50 as Transactions Jump 200%
- CHMPZ Price Prediction:Will This Net-Zero Community Token be the Next Gem?
- Ethereum (ETH) Price Set for a rebound as Whales Accumulate $1.6B ETH and Outflows Hit $622M
- HYPE Price Prediction As Bitwise Files For Hyperliquid ETF – Is $55 In Sight?
- Shiba Inu Price Eyes Recovery From Demand Zone With Burn Rate Soaring Nearly 400%