American Securities Association Sues SEC Over Lack of Transparency
Highlights
- The American Securities Association sued the SEC over lack of transparency.
- The body claims the financial refused to disclose how it arrived at penalties.
- On their part, the SEC pointed to Exception 7(a) as reasons.
The American Securities Association (ASA) has sued the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over its enforcement actions and failure to comply with the Freedom of Information Act. The lawsuit stems from regulatory actions by the Commission with limited information given to stakeholders. At the moment, consumers have criticized the Commission’s lack of disclosure on social media spaces.
AMA Sues The SEC
In a June 6 filing, the Securities Association seeks disclosures from the Commission on previous regulatory actions in which it imposed sanctions. According to court documents, the action is to compel compliance with the Freedom of Information Act.
“In our democratic system, transparency is a two-way street. Federal law also demands transparency from the government. Under the Freedom of Information Act, the public is entitled to documents created by federal agencies so the people can learn about their government’s actions and policies.”
In 2021, the SEC investigated broker-dealer retention of communications on personal devices. Scores of documents were provided to the financial regulator without suspicion of breach of rules. This led to the SEC imposing billions in penalties without explanation on the decision-making process. ASA sought answers regarding how penalties were calculated, and why defaulters were targeted.
They noted that the regulator failed to comply with its obligations citing previous SEC Commissioners’ comments on the penalty regime as a tool to generate end-of-year statistics and not to enhance market integrity and drive investor protection.
Regulator Cites Exception
In response to ASA’s request for details under the Freedom of Information Act, the SEC pointed to Exception 7(a) to the effect that documents may reasonably interfere with ongoing enforcement proceedings. However, ASA seeks documents for settled proceedings which the Commission cannot withhold the requested information.
“And even if the SEC could withhold documents on these grounds, it has fallen woefully short of its high burden to justify the withholding, as it has provided nothing but general, boilerplate statements for refusing to comply with ASA’s FOIA requests,” they added.
Also Read: AI Giants OpenAI and Microsoft Routed By FTC, DOJ On Antitrust Concerns
- Bitcoin Hyper Presale Review: How Utility is Unlocked With ZK-SVM Rollup
- Morgan Stanley Turns Bullish, Says Fed Will Cut Rates by 25bps This Month
- ETF Expert Nate Geraci Says Bitcoin Still Lacks Proof of Digital Gold Status
- Pi Network Update: Team Launches AI Tools to Boost KYC and Mainnet Migration for Investors
- U.S. SEC’s Crypto Task Force Sets Dec. 15 for Privacy Roundtable After Previous Delay
- Ethereum Price Holds $3,000 as Bitmine Scoops Up $199M in ETH; What Next?
- Solana Price Outlook Strengthens as Spot ETFs See $15.68M in Fresh Inflows
- Dogecoin Price Gears Up for a $0.20 Breakout as Inverse H&S Takes Shape
- Bitcoin Price Forecast as BlackRock Sends $125M in BTC to Coinbase — Is a Crash Inevitable?
- XRP Price Prediction As Spot ETF Inflows Near $1 Billion: What’s Next?
- Solana Price Outlook: Reversal at Key Support Could Lead to $150 Target





