Binance US Legal Woes Intensify As Appeals Court Revives Lawsuit

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has revived a class-action lawsuit against Binance.US, accusing the exchange of manipulating the HEX token’s price.
By Coingapestaff
Binance US Announces Cessation Of Operations In Washington, Here's Why

Highlights

  • The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has reinstated a class-action lawsuit against Binance.US for alleged HEX token price manipulation.
  • Plaintiff Ryan Cox claims Binance.US and CoinMarketCap unlawfully manipulated HEX’s ranking, affecting its market price.
  • The ruling challenges previous dismissal, highlighting jurisdictional connections and allowing the case to proceed for further examination.

A United States appeals court has breathed new life into a class-action lawsuit against Binance US, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges. The lawsuit, which alleges manipulation of the HEX token’s price, had previously been dismissed but has now been partially revived.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Appeals Court Reinstated Lawsuit Against Binance US

The United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has partially overturned the dismissal of a class-action lawsuit against Binance US. The lawsuit, centered on alleged price manipulation of the HEX cryptocurrency token, has been given new life following the court’s ruling on August 12.

The case, initially filed in 2021 by plaintiff Ryan Cox, accuses the crypto exchange and CoinMarketCap of unlawfully manipulating the HEX token’s price. Cox alleges that these entities artificially restricted HEX’s ranking on CoinMarketCap, a Binance-owned cryptocurrency price-tracking platform, trading at lower prices than Binance’s cryptocurrencies.

A panel of three judges disagreed with the district court’s earlier dismissal, which had ruled that Cox failed to establish a sufficient connection between specific actions in Arizona and Binance US. The appeals court found that the district court’s requirement for establishing “sufficient minimum contacts” was incorrect. It noted that both parties have significant connections with the broader United States due to their incorporation or principal place of business within the country.

The panel’s opinion stated that these connections satisfy the due process requirements for personal jurisdiction and determined that Cox’s claims of price manipulation against Binance.US were valid. As a result, the case has been remanded for further legal proceedings.

This ruling comes against increased scrutiny of the HEX token and its founder, Richard Heart. On July 31, 2023, the SEC filed a separate lawsuit against Heart for alleged violations of federal securities laws and defrauding investors of at least $12.1 million. The SEC claims that Heart misused investor funds for personal luxury purchases, including a 555-carat diamond, expensive watches, and high-end cars.

Reviving this lawsuit against them adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing legal challenges in the cryptocurrency industry, potentially setting precedents for how U.S. courts approach jurisdiction in cases involving digital asset exchanges and price manipulation allegations.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Binance Celebrates Partial Victory In SEC Case

In a separate legal matter, Binance is celebrating a significant milestone in its ongoing dispute with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). A federal court recently dismissed several of the SEC’s major claims against the exchange, including rulings that crypto tokens are not securities.

Also, sales of Binance Coin (BNB) on secondary exchanges were not sufficiently alleged to be securities, and Binance’s stablecoin, BUSD, is not classified as a security. Binance hailed this decision as a victory for the entire cryptocurrency industry, while Binance US stated it remains prepared for the next phases of this legal journey.

Advertisement
Coingapestaff
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.