Breaking: Blockchain Association and CFAT Sues SEC Over Dealer Rule
Highlights
- The lawsuit challenges the SEC's expanded definition of digital asset dealers, alleging that it could unfairly label traders as dealers.
- SEC approved a new dealer definition in February, emphasizing functional analysis of securities trading activities.
- Critics argue that the SEC's approach to digital assets lacks clarity, contributing to regulatory uncertainty within the industry.
The Blockchain Association and the Crypto Freedom Alliance of Texas (CFAT) have filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The suit challenges a new rule that broadens the definition of a “dealer” in the realm of digital assets. Filed in the District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the legal challenge aims to overturn this expanded interpretation.
SEC Accused of Overreach in Digital Asset Regulation
The plaintiffs argue that the new definition could unfairly categorize mere digital asset traders as dealers. This concern arises from the rule’s focus on the effects of trading rather than the nature of the transactions themselves. They claim that the rule does not differentiate between dealers and individuals trading for their accounts, which is traditionally exempt from dealer status. The lawsuit alleges that the SEC bypassed necessary procedures by not thoroughly considering public feedback or conducting an economic analysis as required by law.
The Blockchain Association has expressed its disapproval, noting that the rule could encompass all participants in digital asset markets, including users who only participate in liquidity pools. They argue that this broad sweep is indicative of the SEC’s overreach in its regulatory attempts.
Blockchain Association Fights Warren’s Digital Asset Legislation
In February, the SEC approved the new dealer definition by a 3-2 vote, emphasizing a functional analysis of securities trading activities. The regulator defended its decision, stating that excluding cryptocurrency from this definition could grant crypto dealers an unfair advantage over traditional financial entities.
Critics have described the SEC’s approach to digital assets as inconsistent. The commission has yet to clearly define which digital asset transactions qualify as securities transactions, leading to uncertainty within the industry. Critics say the SEC utilizes ad hoc methods to classify digital assets as securities, contributing to regulatory confusion.
In related news, the Blockchain Association has also voiced concerns regarding Senator Elizabeth Warren‘s proposed legislation. The Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2023 has been criticized for potentially undermining U.S. competitiveness and economic stability. The association warns that such legislation could threaten thousands of American jobs and force U.S. companies to relocate offshore.
The lawsuit requests the court to declare the SEC’s rule as arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. It seeks to prevent the SEC from enforcing this rule, highlighting its potential to drive innovation out of the U.S.
Read Also: Tron Founder Justin Sun Buys $1B In ETH, A Price Recovery Ahead?
- Crypto Market Continues to Plunge, Could 2026 Be the Worst Year?
- XRP News: Ripple Prime Adds Support for Hyperliquid, Providing Wall Street Access to DeFi
- Breaking: Bank of America (BofA) Reveals Holdings in This XRP ETF
- BlackRock Signal Further Downside for Bitcoin And Ethereum As It Moves $170M to Coinbase
- Just-In: Binance Buys Additional 1,315 BTC for SAFU Fund
- Pi Network Price Outlook as Bitcoin Faces a Strong Sell-Off Below $80k
- Bitcoin Price Prediction As US House Passes Government Funding Bill to End Shutdown
- Ondo Price Prediction as MetaMask Integrates 200+ Tokenized U.S. Stocks
- XRP Price Risks Slide to $1 Amid Slumping XRPL Metrics and Burn Rate
- Gold and Silver Prices Turn Parabolic in One Day: Will Bitcoin Mirror the Move?
- Cardano Price Prediction as the Planned CME’s ADA Futures Launch Nears














